Skip to main content

My 2013 has been very fortunate to be recruited by a few small D2 and D3 schools. From the start, I understood that D3 athletes receive no preference for merit/financial aid and that all aid is based on academic performance.

 

i have two sons headed to college next year as Freshman. As May 1st approaches, I have worked closely with financial aid representatives at several schools to maximize scholarships and aid.

 

During ongoin discussions with financial aid officers and admissions councelors at several D3 schools, one FA officer implied that being an athlete at a D3 college can be a disadvantage regarding merit aid. She explained that although no athletic scholarships are offered at D3 schools, the NCAA reviews and compares D3 merit aid amounts granted to athletes to non athletes to review and ensure consistency.

 

Has anyone else received similar information

 

Thank you in advance.

 

 

 

Last edited by Bludevil_bk
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Bluedevil_bk,

 

Yes, sometimes the NCAA will audit a school to ensure atheletes and non-athletes are getting the same FA package. I know of such a school that was audited a few years ago.   Private (D3) schools can offer institutional grants to whomever they want, I think the NCAA wants to make sure that it isn't all going to athletes.  I have heard of this.   But, I'm puzzled by the FA officers comments in terms of being a disadvantage.  I'd call her/him to explain why and how it is a disadvantage.

 

Good luck.

 

There are two elements to the question of financial aid at D3's. First is the athletic componet which has been accuretly stated. The second is the institutional philosophy of aid which clearly differs from institution to institution. Some institutions believe that athletics is core to their educational mission; others feel that it is a finanical drain to the school. Each schools philosphy will likely carry through to how much and when financial aid is offfered.

This is something I always wondered about.

  1. Do they look at each individual package for athletes and compare them to the core.
  2. Do they look at all packages to athletes as a whole compared to the core.

In option two I can see how it could be a disadvantage to be an athlete. Lets say they give preferential packages to their top recruits that are better than the core, and to balance that out the give packages to the bottom recruits that are worse than the core.

 

I am not saying his is happening I just always wondered.

 

BLD,

Here are links to a couple of NCAA notifications on D3 which relate to your post and also address the questions from the OP(the first one seems almost directly on the point of the OP and your questions)::

 

http://www.ncaa.org/wps/wcm/co...+broader+allegations

 

https://web1.ncaa.org/LSDBi/ex...20899&division=3

 

I hope each are of some help in how the rules are to be applied at D3 and how some programs have tended toward lack of compliance coupled with the NCAA response.

 

Thanks for the responses.

 

Sorry, Fenway South I was not clear, The FA office did not out right say it was a disadvantage. It was implied stating that she had to review athletes...and I inferred based on her statements the school did not have the same oversight restrictions for non - athletes.

 

Second, I got the impression she looked at each individual athlete and compared it to the average non athlete aid package, (she was expressed as % of aid to total tuition)

But, I did not ask that specific question.

 

Small Private School Financial Aid offices appear to have lots of latitude. If you fit a profile and fall above there averages, there seems to be very generous aid packages available. These profiles and averages are unique, may change from year to year and are unspoken.

 

 

 

 

Originally Posted by Bludevil_bk:

Thanks for the responses.

 

Sorry, Fenway South I was not clear, The FA office did not out right say it was a disadvantage. It was implied stating that she had to review athletes...and I inferred based on her statements the school did not have the same oversight restrictions for non - athletes.

 

Second, I got the impression she looked at each individual athlete and compared it to the average non athlete aid package, (she expressed this total aid as a % total tuition cost excluding room and borard)

 

But, I did not ask that specific question.

 

Small Private School Financial Aid offices appear to have lots of latitude. If you fit a profile and fall above their averages, there seems to be very generous aid packages available. These profiles are unique and they may change along with the averages GPA and SAT sScores from year to year and are unspoken.

 

 

 

 

 

Last edited by Bludevil_bk

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×