Many (greedy) College & University administrators have learned that they can generate extra tuition income for their schools by offering the illusion of playing college sports to aspiring young athletes. It occurs at all levels of college athletics, from JuCo to D1. In cases where a school isn’t fully funded this practice of over-recruiting is actually necessary for some sports to continue to exist. But that’s certainly not the case most places. The most important thing in today’s recruiting world is to be fishing in the right pond. This isn’t true in every case but IMO kids that reach for a program (ie; turn down a scholarship to a D2 or JuCo to walk on at a D1) are the ones most likely to end up with a redshirt or a grayshirt. It’s important to know your standing as you enter a program. Are you in their plans? Or are you a fundraiser?? Because whatever your role is when you enter is likely going to remain the same as long as you are there.
Agree.
As a first pass, Student Athletes and families need to use data driven methods to understand the roster management strategy of their target school(s). If you find some red flags, don't be shy with asking pointed questions.
Data doesn't lie, people do
Currently, 283 out of 305 NCAA-D1 programs have published preliminary rosters. we uploaded the majority between sept and dec, thus we will expect changes.
CBI goal was to provide some context as to how many players a school will normally bring in for the fall.
We've posted the fall rosters as 2024 projections
The free version provides a very limited view, there are some schools we've open for trial view
UCONN
Washington State
Nebraska
Ohio State
https://collegebaseballinsight...nover-insights-free/
Once a student athlete has done some due diligence, they should come to this forum to get the more nuanced answers.