Our pitchers got called for 4 balks tonight. Youth (5th, 6th graders), FED Rules:
1. The ump called a balk with no runners on and the pitcher, throwing from the stretch, gets his sign from the catcher, starts to put his hands together, but stops before he brings his hands together and drops his hands again to his side and looks again at the catcher, then puts his hands together and comes set. He never made it to set and with no runners on, is this a balk / illegal pitch? Also, our local rules state a warning to the pitcher for balk calls - would this count as a warning (since technically it wasn't a balk), should it have been a ball, or if a later balk were called, should that have been the warning?
2. From the stretch, with no runners on, the pitcher didn't stop (come set) before pitching to a batter.
3. From the stretch with the bases loaded, the pitcher brings his hands together, but doesn't stop fidgeting with the ball and glove (he was trying to get his curveball grip - did I mention he was 11?). The ump balked him while he was still fidgeting. I claim since he never stopped fidgeting, he hadn't "stopped" or become set. If, once he gets his grip, he doesn't pause before he pitches, I see a balk, but while the pitcher is struggling to get the grip? The ump's explanation was that he could move his hand in the glove, but not the glove - it was the movement of the glove that caused the balk call.
4. In FED, is a balk a dead ball or does the pitch continue? Ump called a balk, pitch continues, called a ball, and everyone moves up a base (on ball 4). I thought the ump called Time on the balk, but I guess he called balk.
5. I'm still confused about what you can do from the stretch with no runners on. I know if you drop the ball while in contact with the rubber and no runners on, it's nothing. What other balk specifications don't apply if there are no runners on?
I am hoping I live long enough to understand the nuances and interpretations of the balk. It is still pretty much a mystery to me as it seems the call is more art than science.
Original Post