Jacjacatk,
As much as you want to think you're being persecuted for your viewpoint, you're not.
The reason your posts so often draw moderator attention is that your comments are too frequently the point of final departure from the original baseball-related thread.
If someone says, "I hope Santa brings me a sled for Christmas," you seem compelled to start a fight about whether Santa exists.
It's not your viewpoint. It's your bad manners.
If the shoe was on the other foot, I would be defending you.
If, for example, you made a constructive comment in the course of a thread about pitching mechanics that alluded to the evolution of some specialized body part related to pitching, I would consider it legitimate discourse. If one of your theistic brethren then jumped in and challenged your comment and wanted to start an argument about whether the UCL evolved or was created, I would throw the penalty flag on the person who seized the opportunity to derail the baseball related conversation.
As it happens, people are more likely to make incidental references to things they do believe in than to things they do not believe in, so in the natural course of events, you may have more opportunities to let things pass than some other members.
But the rule works both ways, as my comments make clear.
In this particular thread, it wasn't so clean because the original expression of belief was accompanied by a comment that called attention to itself. But the principle holds. You didn't have to take the bait.
If you want to discuss further, take it to a Dialog.