Have read with interest informative post on here in regard to preferred walk on (PWO). A label for my son currently as a freshman at D1 school who is getting about $24K in academic scholly/aid.
Not sure how to read his situation (ok more so the coaches) as to where he stands so far in the fall ball scenario--any insight from experienced posters greatly appreciated.
Suppose it makes sense NLI players are getting more playing time than PWO's but they ain't hittin' to good (some not at all?) and so far in the 4 "limited" intra-squad games my son has played/batted in he has a hit in each game (3 singles and 2B) only struckout his first AB but not since in 13 PA, 1BB, 3 SB, 3 rbi's and 2 runs scored.
He has done this from both sides of the plate as a legit SH.
Ran a 6.75 60 handles workouts with ease --and is fundamentally sound in playing CF/LF positions.
Does not have cannon arm but is fast to the ball, hits relays and and it is plenty of arm for those positions.
OK- were told by (here is one issue) now "former" recruiting coord--after official visit last fall our son had a "guaranteed roster" spot which helped him make the choice to attend this college (OK that plus $24K in academic $$$).
Current Coaching staff seems more focused on "newer" recruits based on imbalance of playing time but as I have read on here-every team ends up carrying some PWO's just because the logistics in BB scholly money mandates it.
While there are other PWO's self-cutting themselves due to inequities they see in playing time and or because they asked the coach where they stood and did not like the answers they got--I have kept telling my son to just stay focused on his goal and NOT get caught up in what other PWO's are doing or their negativity. Essentially to not even give any coach a reason to believe he does not think he is good enough to make the team. HE IS HITTING while a whole bunch of others (including returners) are not!
Any reason(s) coaches may not be giving him more playing time to this point?
Is there reasons we should be concerned given these circumstances?
Did "guaranteed roster spot" mean at least or only through the fall season? or can coaches make cuts anytime during the fall before the end of fall season?
Thanks!
Original Post