Skip to main content

In lieu of several discussions on so many different threads and also in lieu of some of the Player Profiles I have recieved for tryouts at my school, I've decided to add the following to our Parent's Meeting Handout. While some will disagree, and I can instantly create a list of those that will, this is from my perspective as a coach.

EXPERTS:

Expert is defined as an authority or specialist on a given subject.

While this sounds fantastic, the reality is that Experts are a DIME A DOZEN. Their opinions vary like the wind. What style of hitting is better, linear or rotational? Ask and you shall receive multitudes of opinions. Recently, I heard one college coach commenting on why the linear approach to hitting is superior simply because “that’s how Bobby Bonds and Albert Pujos hit.” Instantly, I knew that I didn’t want my child playing for this guy. However, I saw a room full of parents shaking their heads in agreement. They were listening to an EXPERT. Do you “throw your hands at the ball” or “keep your hands inside the ball?” One is linear and one is rotational. In other words, one requires a downward swing at the ball and one requires that you “match the plane of the ball.” Do you understand the simple rhyme, “Body and hands are better together?” Reality, there is a portion of the swing that incorporates both. Besides hitting, those same EXPERTS have a multitude of opinions on pitching. I’ve actually heard one EXPERT state that he gets increased motion from his pitchers by teaching them to throw “against their arm slot.” First, what does that mean and secondly, why would you want your son changing their natural arm slot? What about “scapula loading?” This is the new catch phrase in pitching? Do you understand that another phrase for scapula is the shoulder blades? If you believe in “scapula loading” then do you also believe in swinging the leg around and down instead of down and forward? GETS CONFUSING DOESN’T IT? Can you believe that we can find EXPERTS on every phase of the game that disagree with each other? EXPERTS can’t even agree on the benefits of icing a pitcher’s arm after a game.

Coach Butler, this is all fine and good as well as somewhat confusing but what is your point? My point is very simple. One young man came up and filled out a tryout questionnaire. His Dad wanted me to know that they had paid a lot of money on “Professional Lessons” and they’d appreciate it if I wouldn’t try to change him. Understandable! Many of you have also paid a small fortune on “Private Lessons.” Great! Your son was able to be around baseball. Please note that we don’t believe in change simply for change sake. However, when and if we determine that your son needs to make adjustments and or wholesale changes we will suggest those changes for the good of our program. Isn’t that what a “Coach” is supposed to do? When it comes to our program and what has been successful for the past 20 years, WE are the EXPERT. As a Parent, please feel free at any time to then remove your son from the program should you feel that your son is being taught something against what your EXPERT has taught. After all, you have paid some “Professional” a lot of money for those “Professional Lessons.”

"Failure depends upon people who say I can't."  - my dad's quote July 1st, 2021.  CoachB25 = Cannonball for other sites.

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Constants. The things that have stood the test of time and all the so called experts. That is what we have tried build our program on. When you constantly change your foundation because this expert says its the way to go only to find out that another expert has decided that the other way is the way to go you end up with confused players confused coaches and no consistency in your program or players. You can go on this site and any other site and you can talk to one scout and then another and everyone will have different EXPERT opinions on the same subject. Stay with the constants the things that have never changed and look for ways to improve through experience and trial and error of your own and your players. Jumping around from one expert opinion to the other will leave you with a kid that has tons of expert advice and absolutely no CLUE.
I have not learned from many experts and therefore I continue to not be one myself. What I have done is seek out information from those who had experience, and through training and education of their own and through proven results have helped me continue to learn. When I instruct or coach, I go with experience, gut feeling and what has proven to work with other players I have taught.
I do tell all players that I work with, that my way is not the only way, nor the most correct way, just the way we are going to work for now. Each player is individual and some aspects of mechanics, either hitting or pitching, will have to be tailored to the individual.
I then make sure I see those kids execute in game situations and watch the results.

I ask all of you for one important favor.
If you ever witness me talking about "scapula loading", shoot first, ask questions later.

By the way, I am from little Italy in my hometown and the only Scapula I ever knew was a kid named Tommy Scapula.
I am a lawyer so you will have to take this with a grain of salt. I once attended a lawyer's conference and heard one of the speakers give the following definition. "An expert, ladies and gentlemen, can be defined by breaking up the word into its component parts. An "ex" is a has been and a "spurt" is a leak under pressure.
Experts are self proclaimed. I have never seen an Experts degree, a college where you can major in expertism, an experts hall of fame, or for that matter a name tag with "expert" on it. It is an "eye of the beholder" label. My question is...If an expert is ever wrong, does that make him no longer an expert?
rz1:

Maybe this will bring a little clarity to the discussion...

An expert is actually an expert. That would make an expert someone who was formerly pert.


pert (pûrt) pronunciation
adj., pert·er, pert·est.

1. Trim and stylish in appearance; jaunty: a pert hat.
2. High-spirited; vivacious.
3. Impudently bold; saucy.

[Middle English, unconcealed, bold, short for apert, obvious, frank (probably influenced by Old French aspert, espert, clever), from Old French, from Latin apertus, open, past participle of aperīre, to open.


So...an expert is someone who used to be trim and stylish, or even jaunty! Perhaps they were high-spirited, vivacious, impudently bold or saucy...

Makes you wonder what they are now...now that they are no longer pert! king
Last edited by gotwood4sale
quote:
Originally posted by rz1:
I have never seen...a name tag with "expert" on it.


rz, I once attended a convention and they asked me my title...I said "King."

When they gave me my convention packet, the name tag said "King Mike F" on it. I kinda liked it. I even recieved follow up mail from the convention addressed to King Mike F.

Had I only chosen "expert" as my title, I could have shown you something you had never seen.

king
King Mike F
quote:
Originally posted by gotwood4sale:

So...an expert is someone who used to be trim and stylish, or even jaunty! Perhaps they were high-spirited, vivacious, impudently bold or saucy...

Makes you wonder what they are now...now that they are no longer pert! king


GotW, omg, I used to be trim and stylish (if not quite jaunty). body-builderI must be an expert! And you wonder what I am now. If you ask me, I'll say "King!"
king

His Majesty Mike F
Last edited by Mike F

Add Reply

Post
.
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×