Skip to main content

The real question is "What's the next step??"

Recruiting for college and scouting for the draft has evolved over the years and will continue to do so. What is the next logical step in this continuing development process?

Examples:
Years ago, High School and Legion ball was all that was necessary. Of course the draft seemed to last a week and colleges were secondary in consideration.

AAU (and similar) organizations began making in-roads into the player market and people discovered that it was convenient to bring the top talent to a single location for scouting.

Touraments sprang up under multiple umbrella organizations, attracting players from different sections of the country.

"Showcasing", based on the pro-tryout model began to occur and scouting organizations began to flourish (at least the ones who were good at what they did).

The emphasis was brought back on wood in order to provide the pro scouts with a look at the complete player (helping the college recruiter at the same time).

The situation now:
More and more players have discovered the benefits of "showcasing". Teams are beginning to flock to the "big events" (i.e. WWBA, etc) in order to establish themselves and lend themselves an air of legitimacy. Soon, it may become difficult to find the trees in the forest, so another "level" will be introduced in the ever ongoing effort to winnow the prospects down to a manageable number.

- - - - - - - - - -
What comes next?? A National Wood Bat summer conference with a limited # of teams/state (maybe 1 team per 3,000,000 population or some such formula)????? MLB sponsorship on a state-by-state basis of limited summer teams with tryouts, etc????

Why ask? A lot of "models" are going to be tried out over the next few years with varying degrees of success based on the financial commitment, resources and reputation of the organizations attempting them. Just wondered (for the sake of the 2008/2009's and beyond) what to look for down the road.

Any ideas?
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

B,

Great topic.

Here's my opinion:

I think you will see local (meaning in-state) and regional organizations - packed with quality baseball people - begin to stay a bit closer to home.

I believe they will - on a local/regional basis - begin to sponsor more in-state tournaments. Will attract the best of a state or a region. Will also make the process more affordable to the youngsters' families.

I also believe MLB baseball will do nothing to assist. Just too much greed in MLB. As long as they can produce players more cheaply overseas - they will not help here in the states.

The evolution contines.

Great topic IMO.
Itsinthe game is on the right track.

The exposure tactics, showcases etc.., are working models. PG has taken that to the next level by localizing with id showcases. I think this process will identify the "players" and when players/parents and select teams disect the player ratings the cream will be at national events.
Last edited by rz1
But are we on the right track???

If there was NO SYSTEM in place, no summer teams, no fall teams, no showcase events, no youth leagues ... nothing but a HS season, College season and a pro-draft, then how would you structure a system that was comprehensive, meaningful, winnowed out the chaff, gave everyone who desired a solid opportunity, became progressively more selective ..... etc etc etc.

Should the entire process be re-invented?? What would it look like?? Where are the problems in what we already do and what would you change??
B,

IMO - the process is significantly better than it used to be.

But like anything else in life - in order to participate in it - it takes more effort,sacrifice and money.

I think the "process" will continue to refine itself. More stuff locally and regionally - maybe a bit less nationally - with overall quality improving at all levels - and affordability improved.

I definitely do not think the process needs to be reinvented. It will refine itself.

It certainly is alot better than the 1970's and 1980's - thats for sure IMO.

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×