I can't say that I'm close to the program or anything, but they are fairly close by and I'm never heard a lot of negatives about the staff. I do know a good number of kids who played HS and travel ball for the chief assistant and he was well liked back then.
Having said that, Furman is not for everyone. My IMPRESSION is that more kids tend to not like the school/atmosphere than dislike the program. I know 4 kids that my son played with/against in HS. One, the best student of the lot, loves it and is still there. Of the other 3, 1 probably would not have been admitted were it not for baseball and the other 2 would have been close calls. The one who probably would not have been admitted hated the place and left after a semester. One of the marginal admits stayed 2 years then transferred. Word was that he also hated the school. I know he had to go to summer school his first summer to get his GPA up. BUT, the way he was managed as a pitcher may have had something to do with it. The other marginal admit considered transferring after his freshman year but is still there.
Son's best friend from HS (non-athlete) loves it there. Son has visited a time or two, on a RARE day off, and also likes the place. But another HS classmate, female s****r player, spent a year there and hated it.
I suspect that socio-economic factors are a factor for some kids. Who wants to pay $50K a year to hang out with people with which they have little in common?
Furman remains a great academic school. It was once considered the premier academic school in the state, but a number of other schools have closed the gap to the point that I'm not sure that is true anymore. But, all it takes is a few professors trying to prove a point to make things miserable for marginal students who are already dealing with a full athletic workload.
Now that they are fully funded I expect them to gradually start moving up the SoCon ladder. But, at $50K a year with fairly rigorous academics, they're still going to have to go after certain types of kids.