Skip to main content

Speaking of high level college and professional baseball. I know what I'd consider a good batting average. Anything over .300, probably a little higher in college.

What about slugging percentage and on base percentage? And would you look at them as numbers all by themselves or would you say that each one should be X number above the player's batting average?

For example, if batter hit .325, should slugging be 125 points higher and on base 100 points higher?

Thanks.
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

OPS On base plus slugging is a quick and dirty best measurement for a hitter. Anyone going 300/400/500 is having a great year at any level. Some are making the case for multipling OBP by SLG to get a better measure of a hitter's offensive contribution. I believe the importance of the two measures depends on the type of hitter you are. If you don't have have the ability to score a run yourself or get yourslf into scoring position (slg%), then you had better avoid making outs, (OBP), at a very high rate. In MLB .800 OPS is star level.
Yes, the slash line - AVG/OBP/SLG

http://giantspod.net/2011/01/1...rt-1-the-slash-line/

For me WHIP for a pitcher is comparable to OPS for a hitter. If I had only one stat to measure a pitcher my choice would be Walks+Hits/Innings Pitched.

A couple of other stats that might really help you understand how good a hitter or pitcher is relative to his current level of competition and which helps you project how well he'd do at a higher level are BB/K ratio and K/9. If a hitter is walking as often as he is striking out he projects pretty well at a higher level. Any pitcher who prevents 1 or more hitters per inning from even putting the ball in play has a big advantage.

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×