You really need to find someone he can work with individually. www.webball.com has some drills and books you can look into also. It is a good resource.
quote:Originally posted by BOF:
You really need to find someone he can work with individually. www.webball.com has some drills and books you can look into also. It is a good resource.
I agree that an individual coach is the way to go.My son had an instructor that we went to together and it helped with his power to all fields.He was already a good hitter and had already hit a few homeruns so this philosophy didn't make a hitter where there was not 1.It did make for a more compact and versital hitter.
The bat on the shoulder and torque drills are done before every game.When he goes to practice with his team and they have them do stuff off the T,he can go back to these drills without my supervision.
[jpk3 wrote]I looked it up. Did your son go through the class? How much did it help with his swing and power? You mentioned drills that he can do on this own. Did he get them from the course? As with most sights they give you a little info. then hope you jump in. Just want to make sure it is a quality thing and not just another gimmick. There are plenty of those out there.[/quote]
JPK - we are fortunate to live not far from Mike Epstein and my son goes to his house for lessons (cage in the basement). Actually, Jake Epstein works with my son, although Mike will stop by and offer insights from time to time. Their approach is so common sense based - match the swing plane to the incoming pitch. The slow-mo analysis of students and proven MLB swings provides excellent comparisons and teaching points. Yes, there is a hard-sell aspect to the website; they are in it as a business. Nonetheless, they do a GREAT job and the results are very much worth it. In particular, the teaching methods that Mike has developed are clear and easy to comprehend and lead to easy drills that can be done at home or before BP. Disclaimer - I have no relationship with Epstein Hitting other than being a very satisfied client.
JPK - we are fortunate to live not far from Mike Epstein and my son goes to his house for lessons (cage in the basement). Actually, Jake Epstein works with my son, although Mike will stop by and offer insights from time to time. Their approach is so common sense based - match the swing plane to the incoming pitch. The slow-mo analysis of students and proven MLB swings provides excellent comparisons and teaching points. Yes, there is a hard-sell aspect to the website; they are in it as a business. Nonetheless, they do a GREAT job and the results are very much worth it. In particular, the teaching methods that Mike has developed are clear and easy to comprehend and lead to easy drills that can be done at home or before BP. Disclaimer - I have no relationship with Epstein Hitting other than being a very satisfied client.
The right swing depends on the player and how the player projects. Most players are best suited to a line drive swing with a slight bias toward the ground ball when they don't make full contact. Kids with power are more effective biasing the line drive swing a bit more toward getting the ball in the air. Kids with enough power to hit a significant number of home runs should bias the swing toward more of an uppercut. Hitters with little or no power and lots of speed should be trying to hit line drives that hit the ground before getting to the infielders. Even Williams said there are some hitters who should swing down on the ball.
In my own, admittedly unqualified opinion, every hitter should be trying to hit line drives and the angle should vary a bit depending on how much power they have or project to have. It is really a trial and error thing and it can change as a player matures and faces different types of pitching.
My suggestion is to have your son think of hitting lower line drives to satisfy the coach and hopefully not mess up his swing. BTW, one hits the bottom part of the ball resulting in backspin more often by swinging slightly up than by swinging slightly down.
Tfox,
BTW, my guess is that the HS coaches pushing the grounders will do so even more with the new bats because fewer HS players will have home run power especially given that the current crop has grown up using rocket launchers.
In my own, admittedly unqualified opinion, every hitter should be trying to hit line drives and the angle should vary a bit depending on how much power they have or project to have. It is really a trial and error thing and it can change as a player matures and faces different types of pitching.
My suggestion is to have your son think of hitting lower line drives to satisfy the coach and hopefully not mess up his swing. BTW, one hits the bottom part of the ball resulting in backspin more often by swinging slightly up than by swinging slightly down.
Tfox,
BTW, my guess is that the HS coaches pushing the grounders will do so even more with the new bats because fewer HS players will have home run power especially given that the current crop has grown up using rocket launchers.
Thanks eyeontheball. Nice to know that their program works and you are a satisfied customer. Unfortunately we can't get lessons with Jake. We are on the east coast. I did find a few certified coaches who teach thier methods through their wed site. Im in the process of contacting them. Hope they are as good as Mike and Jake. As you said their approach really makes sense. I know one thing, hitting down on the ball doesn't work. At least not for my son. Thanks again for your input.
quote:Originally posted by CADad:
The right swing depends on the player and how the player projects. Most players are best suited to a line drive swing with a slight bias toward the ground ball when they don't make full contact. Kids with power are more effective biasing the line drive swing a bit more toward getting the ball in the air. Kids with enough power to hit a significant number of home runs should bias the swing toward more of an uppercut. Hitters with little or no power and lots of speed should be trying to hit line drives that hit the ground before getting to the infielders. Even Williams said there are some hitters who should swing down on the ball.
In my own, admittedly unqualified opinion, every hitter should be trying to hit line drives and the angle should vary a bit depending on how much power they have or project to have. It is really a trial and error thing and it can change as a player matures and faces different types of pitching.
My suggestion is to have your son think of hitting lower line drives to satisfy the coach and hopefully not mess up his swing. BTW, one hits the bottom part of the ball resulting in backspin more often by swinging slightly up than by swinging slightly down.
Tfox, BTW, my guess is that the HS coaches pushing the grounders will do so even more with the new bats because fewer HS players will have home run power especially given that the current crop has grown up using rocket launchers.
You may be right but even our high school coach,who also is a proponent of Epstein teachings seems to think the new bats will hurt smaller schools because they tend to be the ones that are swing down schools and have fewer power hitters.Those ground balls imo will just be much easier to field now than they once were and as with any swing,line drives are where it is at,regardless of homeruns.
Only time will tell
jpk3,
FWIW- My son is 11, and has been off/on,and not very disciplined about working on the Epstein stuff that we learned from the DVD "Do We teach What We See?". (mostly just the torque drill) Even considering this, it has helped to some degree. If he put more into it I know he'd get a lot more out of it, and I can say that everything that I've seen from Epstein just makes sense.
Also, one time I had a question and left a voice mail with the number from the website. Jake called me back in a day or 2 and was very helpful and a first class gentleman.
FWIW- My son is 11, and has been off/on,and not very disciplined about working on the Epstein stuff that we learned from the DVD "Do We teach What We See?". (mostly just the torque drill) Even considering this, it has helped to some degree. If he put more into it I know he'd get a lot more out of it, and I can say that everything that I've seen from Epstein just makes sense.
Also, one time I had a question and left a voice mail with the number from the website. Jake called me back in a day or 2 and was very helpful and a first class gentleman.
I guess I am a little confused. I do teach my hitters to hit down through the baseball. Like Coach_May said, I also teach my kids to be short to the zone and long through it. My experience has been that players who started hitting down through the ball conistently started hitting for more power. They really just started hitting the ball harder in general. We also emphasis staying on top of the ball. A good friend of mine played five year in the Detroit Tigers Organization and he taught me a lot of what I teach as far as hitting goes. Is there a chance that the term hitting down through the ball is often understood by some to hit it down? I teach it more like a chop as opposed to driving a nail with a hammer. I am really looking for insight on this. Thanks.
The swing begins down. If you think in terms of what the barrel of the bat does (begins well above the strike zone)then the barrel of the bat obviously must come down. The hands ,too, go slightly down at the beginning of the swing. This is irrefutable.
The plane of the swing levels out-maybe slightly up- as the bat approaches the ball. And then the followthrough may be level or up depending on the location of the pitch.
As long as a hitter can distinguish that the swing begins down, but does not continue down to the ground, then "down" is definitely a worthwhile concept.
The plane of the swing levels out-maybe slightly up- as the bat approaches the ball. And then the followthrough may be level or up depending on the location of the pitch.
As long as a hitter can distinguish that the swing begins down, but does not continue down to the ground, then "down" is definitely a worthwhile concept.
IMO the idea of staying on top of the ball all started when someone caught on to the fact that most fastballs are missed below the ball. That was before there were so many sinker ball pitchers.
Problem is that at the same time most pitches missed on breaking balls are missed above the ball.
So if a hitter were to actually stay above the ball he would become just another victim of the many who didn't make it because they couldn't hit the curve ball.
The theory of chopping down lacks successful examples. I think some believe it creates more back spin.
Obviously the barrell has to drop initially, but only so the hitter can get it close to on plane with the pitch. The term for this is "squaring up" the ball. The best bat/ball contact is pretty much a head on collision! This is why we see so many high finishes. Also there is no margin for error when chopping down.
Most every pitch is on a downward angle to the plate, I'm amazed that so many people think the way to hit is chopping down at a ball that is going downward. We have told hitters facing a good fastball to stay on top. At the same time we have told hitters facing a good breaking ball to stay below the ball. This is just a mental thing rather than anything physical. But never make contact while chopping down.
Problem is that at the same time most pitches missed on breaking balls are missed above the ball.
So if a hitter were to actually stay above the ball he would become just another victim of the many who didn't make it because they couldn't hit the curve ball.
The theory of chopping down lacks successful examples. I think some believe it creates more back spin.
Obviously the barrell has to drop initially, but only so the hitter can get it close to on plane with the pitch. The term for this is "squaring up" the ball. The best bat/ball contact is pretty much a head on collision! This is why we see so many high finishes. Also there is no margin for error when chopping down.
Most every pitch is on a downward angle to the plate, I'm amazed that so many people think the way to hit is chopping down at a ball that is going downward. We have told hitters facing a good fastball to stay on top. At the same time we have told hitters facing a good breaking ball to stay below the ball. This is just a mental thing rather than anything physical. But never make contact while chopping down.
"Hitting down" is a bad myth told by most coaches. There's nothing down about it.
The plane of the bat (heading up) matches the plane of the pitch (heading down).
The ball must be struck in the center or just below center in order to go up. If you hit the top of the ball, it must go down.
The plane of the bat (heading up) matches the plane of the pitch (heading down).
The ball must be struck in the center or just below center in order to go up. If you hit the top of the ball, it must go down.
quote:IMO the idea of staying on top of the ball all started when someone caught on to the fact that most fastballs are missed below the ball. That was before there were so many sinker ball pitchers.
PG; I agree but going a step further it is relative to the era when the high fastball was used more. Good hitters like fastballs and good power hitters love high fastballs. The cue "stay on top" in that instance, is just a reminder to not dip/drop down (with knee and hips) as your first move to the ball or it will be by you whereas to elevate a lower pitch hitters drop to get to the plane of the baseball if they want to elevate the ball in that particular situation.
So match happens from the initial set-up, where the hands and barrel are above the baseball "strike" pitch, to the movements required to match the bat barrel to the arrival point of the center of the baseball in the strike zone. Although the barrel must "move down" to get the ball you wouldn't want someone teaching to "swing down."
I like how I once heard Barry Bonds describe hitting; "it's like catching a baseball with your glove except that you are catching it with the sweetspot of the bat."
Some people have gotten the right idea here. It is about terminology. It's not that the coach is really trying to get guys to hit "down on the ball". It is the fact that he is trying (I think) to get guys to be "short to the ball". I don't know that anybody is attempting to get a player to hit ground balls all of the time. If so, I disagree with the philosophy. However, it is proven and shown in video, pics, etc on the web that good hitters work in a "downhill" swing plane to get "to" the ball but the barrell must stay in the zone at a level plane. "Short to the ball, long through it" or "down to the ball, level extension through it" usually gets the point across with the swing plane that successful hitters generally have. In order to backspin the baseball (which by the way, obviously makes it travel further) a player must consistently work down hill to the baseball, contact top palm up, bottom palm down, and keep extension through the ball on that level plane. So much of hitting instruction comes down to terminology and handling each hitter in his own way. An absolute level or slight uphill swing plane as some have said would mean that a hitter would have to "guess" as to where the pitch enters the hitting zone. Do you want your hitter starting with his hands at his back hip? Doesn't make sense. So.... you have to work downhill to be short to the ball, then the plane changes through contact and extension. I see it in my own head, but it's hard to put in absolute words. A loopy or uphill swing doesn't work to stay on the ball and make it carry.
I just posted this link to an article I wrote that uses a lot of slow motion clips to explain why swinging down on the ball is junk. It seems like most of us agree with this concept, but this may provide you some more ammo to fully understand how the bat should come through the zone.
Swing Down on the ball article
Swing Down on the ball article
This pretty much says it all - Ted Williams 1971. No MLB hitter swings down on the ball.
This swing has nothing to do with "through the ball" or any of that nonsense. The swing plane is determined the moment the hands start moving from the shoulder. Too soon, it's "level/down".
This swing has nothing to do with "through the ball" or any of that nonsense. The swing plane is determined the moment the hands start moving from the shoulder. Too soon, it's "level/down".
There are a ton of good tips in that book you reference on Williams. Some good visuals too!
