Originally Posted by SluggerDad:
One thing I wonder -- apropos the thread about coaches "playing to win." What do you do with a player like this -- a stud in a slump -- if you are his coach? Do you keep riding him, in the same spot in the order (2 hole) hoping he will return to form? Move him down in the order? Sit him and go to your second option while letting him work on things, away from game intensity pressure?
Coaches differ, I know. But isn't this where you get to show your stuff and earn the big bucks? (that's a joke).
But seriously this is one place where the relative shortness of a HS season makes it challenging to manage. 58 PA's covers a lot of games, relatively speaking, in a HS season. In the big scheme of things, it's not that much, I guess. If you had a longer time horizon -- like in MLB -- you would almost certainly just ride it out and chalk it up to normal ebb and flow. You don't really have the same luxury in a 30 game or less season. (and you probably don't have nearly as many alternatives either.).
I'm a bit hesitant to respond since some of your recent posts suggest you are having some serious issues with HS coaches but what the heck...
Beyond what I stated earlier...
Every situation is unique. We have had a few older players go through unexpected struggles at the plate this year with various types of problems. We have also been hit particularly hard with loss of players this year so back-up options are quite limited.
Regardless of any decisions we make with the game line-up, we continuously work toward getting slumping players back on track every day at practice. Many of our practices during the season include simulated game-situation hitting, so we can reasonably monitor progress.
We try different game day solutions depending on the problem. In a few instances, we had 3-4 hole hitters struggling because they weren't handling being pitched backwards or around well, so we moved them down in the line-up (unfortunately, that left us with less-than-ideal hitter types in those spots). In one instance, we kept the player in the game defensively but DH'd for him. In another, we platooned based on opposing starting pitcher type or what position was open for us (based on who was on the bump for us that day). In another, the next man up got the opportunity and took advantage while another got an opportunity and did not. Sometimes, just a game or two on the bench does wonders (but can hurt the team when the option is clearly not as capable). Sometimes the gap in options is too wide and you just have to try and work through it. Once in a great while, a player will prove to be a gamer but not very good at practice. But it is rare that the better players don't show themselves during the many, many hours, reps and situational drills at practice. In all cases, we must consider how any change may affect us defensively as well. Sometimes, we can't put in the other player because it will be too disruptive to the continuity of the D.
We have one player who is more than capable of starting as a hitter but refuses to put in the necessary efforts defensively to win back a starting spot. I'm sure, from a spectator standpoint, and from an offensive stat standpoint, this looks like a terrible coaching assessment and decision. But the players totally get it... and I think appreciate it. And we know it is the right thing to do.
I do wish we had the problem of being deeper in talented players. Been there with other teams. In that situation, the starters work harder to keep their spot and we would generally be a bit quicker at giving the next guy his shot.
You are certainly correct that the short HS season makes things more difficult when this happens but we spend an awful lot of time with these players outside of game days. There really aren't many surprises. We usually know what we're gonna get when we make a change.