Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Yes, its a trend to throw curve balls earlier because they're generally easier to throw (at least some version of them) and young pitchers will get a lot of hitters out using it.

 

I'm not surprised at your numbers.  I was watching an MLB game this weekend where a pitcher was pretty close to dominant.  He had spent 4 or 5 years in the big leagues with so-so results but had 'broken out' in the last couple of years with the development of a changeup.  10 wins already this year with an ERA in the 2's.  His ERA pre-changeup was in the 5's.

I think it is very important.  My son learned a change up at a very early age.  Like 8 or 9 years old.  Worked very well for him for a while, then from around 14 thru HS, he didn't throw it much in games.  His reason was that batters were always late on his FB and the change kind of put his pitches right in their wheel house.  Even though he said this, I continued to encourage him to throw it in bullpens and continue to work on it.  He would throw it once in a while in games, but not often.

 

Fast forward to college.  It is now his best pitch.  His team mates all comment on how wicked it is and it is really his strike out pitch.  Point is that once you move up to the next level, guys can catch up to any fast ball.  Having the change up is a very valuable tool to have on the mound.  Even though your son may not think it is a good pitch to use, have him work on it anyway.  One day he will need to have it and it will be better to have the foundation there than to have to learn a whole new pitch when the time comes.

To be really effective at older levels you need at least 3 pitches. Most boys I see attempt a change at an earlier age, but stop tossing it once they discover or are allowed to throw a breaking ball - whcih I guess is cooler. But a good to great change is deception at it's finest. And even though I generally fall on the side of a hitter, watching some big swinging turk screw himself into the ground swinging at a changeup is always worth the price of admission. 

Young kids feel that a CB is "must have" pitch because it's cool to throw.  This summer our HS program has a lot incoming kids, the most we've had in 5 years or so.  Pur pitching philosophy for the summer is FB and CU...limiting the CB to 5 or 6 an outing. Hammering home location, location, location.  It's nice to watch the kids learn to trust the CU when effectively combined with the FB and location.  CB will stay in the pen until the fall.

justbaseball- +1. A good slider is more effective against both LHHs and RHHs than the same caliber curveball. The spin, depth, and velocity are all more similar to a fastball and therefore more deceptive to a hitter.

It is desirable for a prospect that has arm strength to show the ability to create velocity on a breaking pitch, because that is something that can't be taught. A changeup - the feel and command of the pitch (one that inherently requires less tight spin) - is something that can be taught.

And, for the record, justbaseball's older son does have a very good changeup.

Keep in mind, folks, that current process is far more important than current results in terms of a talent evaluator's ability to project a player's future performance.
Last edited by J H

My son is still working on his CU. He doesn't throw it often in games. It is not quite slow enough to make a huge difference between his fastball, yet finds that most HS players can't keep up with his fastball but the difference of 5 MPH or so and they can hit it (CU). He has 2 other pitches - CB and Slider. Slider is his strike out pitch for most part. His future collage coach has him working in bullpen throwing CU 20-30 to develop it. His basic premise is FB and especially 2 seam fast baseball and slider are close to same speed, CB is good but CU that is 8-10 MPH slower with same motion will be really good for him.

 

I think when a really good hitter faces my son, he gets hit semi often, certainly more than he would like. As he moves onto college, there will be many more of those good hitters. Hence the need to develop the CU 

Originally Posted by Swampboy:

Son's college coach says there is almost no such thing as a good change-up hitter in college ball and stresses its development.  It's harder to do well than most people realize.  

Agree with that it is hard to master. My son has worked harder on that pitch than any he has ever thrown. It is a thing of beauty when thrown correctly by someone. Johnny Cueto come to mind

As others have posted you really need it as you go up in age, at younger ages you can "throw it into bats" You have to have it to throw against "other handers" for a RHP it is a must against  LHHers. The ability to get two plane movement that is different from a slider gives a pitcher three pitches with three different speeds, with three planes. It is one of the more difficult pitches to master. A couple come to my mind, Trevor Hoffman a closer who worked off his change, and Johan Santana a LHP who devastated RHHers with it. Don't forget about Pedro, who many think about his FB, but his change was wicked.  

I love this topic!

I remember the hot discussions we used to have here, curve vs changeup, for youth pitchers. All of those who insisted their pitchers dominated with their CB and didn't need FB or a CU at that age don't post here anymore!

Hmmmm, I wonder why!

The change up has become a game changer, teach it early because the more the young pitcher gets set in his ways, the harder it is to master the CU.  FB, CU more important!

 

Son doesn't throw a CB because he uses a slider, pitchers, I have been told, should use one or the other and that is dependent on the pitcher.   He  also never developed the CU to his satisfaction, as he always relied on his 2 seamer for the off speed.

 

Add Reply

Post
.
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×