Skip to main content

Runners on 1st & 2nd, 1 out.
Wind is gusting at 35mph
Batter hits high fly ball midway between 1st & 2nd.
Ump immediately calls infield fly as 2B-man camps under it and waits.
Wind plays with the ball noticeably, 2B-man ends up dropping it.
To catch that ball under those conditions would have required more than ordinary effort. So it seems like the infield fly rule shouldn't have been called, even though the position of the ball was clearly in the infield -- and easily catchable under normal circumstances.
What should happen here?
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Let me re-phrase it: he failed to catch it ... because the wind was playing havoc with it. Point is that under those conditions it would have taken an extra-ordinary effort to catch it.

Not trying to be petty here, but it does seem like this would be open to some judgement on the part of the ump. Problem was, he called it as soon as it left the bat.

Thanks!
Wind could very well determine an umpires judgement to rule INF. Your description however, "Ump immediately calls infield fly as 2B-man camps under it and waits". Indicates to me the umpire was correct in his call. Remember this rule is to protect the baserunners. Don't call this one an infield fly and you've probably got a double play.
Generally the call is made when the ball reaches it's apex, then make the judgement,is the fielder under it?
I've called the INF when I knew very well the ball probably would not be caught do to talent level of the players. Remember "if the ball could be caught with ordinary effort". Not will be caught,we've seen the pro's miss these, it happens, but "could have been caught" is the key.

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×