quote:
Note then when they contacted the head of the umpiring assocation he washed his hands of the mess and simply told them to follow the scholastic rule. I'm sure he had more words for them after the game.
You know when I first read the article I thought the head umpire passed the buck back to them but after reading all of your post I can see where he was trying to keep them from opening a can or worms.
So basically the Mount View coach should have let the guy pitch and then protested or said something after the game? Then the tournament director or state governing body could make the final decision.
I wonder how this would have been handled in a state like Kentucky that doesn't allow protests if it was handled like you say it should have been?