Skip to main content

I read an article in yesterdays tribune that a high school player, in a game against driscoll was allowed to throw 180 pitches. the final score was 15-14. this pitchers' team was down by 7 runs (if memory serves me). What in the world was the coach thinking? Why did the parents stand by and let this happen? Why did the player (a sen.) let it occur?

I am the father of 2 pitchers. I can't imagine that I could tolerate this kind of non-coaching, or should I say abuse. Nothing good could come of this. Appearently winning at any cost means simply that! This is a CRIME! Shame on all involved!!
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

TR

Say what you want but no one should be throwing 150 pitches in the name of "The kids today do not throw enough!!!"

My arm was shot at 19. I remember what the Dr. told me how the tendons in my arm looked like after opening me up. Coaches threw me and every other pitcher with any talent all the time in the name of winning- we had no pitch counts. You started every M/F. If you think that kids don't throw enough than why don't we go back to that system? Maybe pitch counts got put in place to protect kids from morons who don't know what they are doing.

I am commenting on whether a kid should throw 150, not whether or not he did. Read the book, "Saving the Pitcher."

Wake up.
TR, sorry, but I can't agree with you. This is year 2009, and there is so much information that has been published about how pitch counts and excessive innings are a precursor to shoulder/elbow surgery. A coach would have to be a moron to either ignore these well known facts, or feel that he knows better than the folks at ASMI, or Dr. Andrews directly.

Why does it matter who kept the pitch count? One guy who must not have is the head coach. If you think that a parent bringing this to the attention of an AD will make a player "soft" I cannot agree. Is it better to ignore the situation and run the very real risk of injury to your son? JMO.
Last edited by itsrosy
Run to the AD, run to the coach who cares?

Anyone who knows baseball knows that pitch counts such as this are just not acceptable no matter if it is 130, 150 or 180 pitches. It is total BS and cannot be defended.

Just ask yourself this, if this were in the classroom, would a teacher be able to get by with physical abuse such as this or something similar? I think not. School administration would become involved with it then wouldn't they? What's the difference really? I don't see any except for the setting of the situation.
I still don't get TR's point. Is he saying that nothing should be said to anyone when this type of player abuse/misuse occurs and the parents should just let it slide? I don't get it. And who cares who is keeping the pitch count? What difference does it make even if it is off a few pitches? That statement makes no sense and has nothing to do with the point in question.
****le


one hint---do not guess

secondly--what irritates me are parents who run to some authority figure when things don't satisfy their want and needs---AND THEN LET US SUE !!!!

TR,
I don't wish to jump to conclusions here. You've stated that it's too many pitches, and also that parents shouldn't run to some authority figure.

How do you think this should be handled? Should the AD or some authority figure/coaches boss be informed of the incident? If so, who should do the informing?

I'm not trying to bait you here, I am genuinely trying to understand how you see a solution to this coming about.
Last edited by CPLZ
WOODY

Just relax---I do not need geritol--If I took that can I pass the NCAA drug test ?

Like I said- a wood salesman is a wood salesman


We used to have a bathroom accessory salesman whowould vist us every month---my girl at the front desk had orders to ask him if he had new "material"


Special spot in my heart goes to all construction salesmen --- they are sure different
Last edited by TRhit
I'm in late on this one - but in my opinion that is abuse akin to sending a kid with a concussion back into a football game. The coach should be either fired or reprimanded immediately. It doesn't matter that the kid said he "wanted to pitch" or "felt fine" - these are just cowardly excuses for coaches who can't bear making the right call on behalf of the kid. Every pitch after about 110 is exponentially mroe dangerous than the one before -- and young arms are FAR MORE proned to overuse injuries than mature arms -- and no professional team in existence would allow a mature arm to throw like that - it's just inexcusable.
Thanks hopperhop - that's exactly what I meant. Obviously a concussion is a far more serious injury because it can be life threatening. But in baseball terms - every pitch after about 110 carries a greater risk of ending a promising career. There is FAR TOO MUCH research available for High School coaches to pretend to be unaware of the danger. I'm just tired of coaches using the justification, "Well I asked him, and he said he could go." Most every kid who pitches does so because he loves to throw -- and most have to be dragged off the mound. So be a coach and tell him when he is done.
Pitch count is just a number and doesn't always tell the truth. I do agree that 180 pitches is way to much ,but differnet variables go into how many pitches a kid should be able to throw.

- How long of rest does he have in between innings. Is he getting good time or is his team going 1-2-3 every inning.

-Weather conditions and the type of game. Is he going deep in counts and having to make a lot of tough pitches?

- You can tell if the players arm is down by his velcity, location, and his actions on the mound not just a number.

The players condition and arm care he does in the off season has to do with how long he should be able to go. Check out what Nolan Ryan is doing with teh rangers now. He is throwing away the pitch count. Doesn't even keep track of it now and lets the body tell him when he should come out instead of a overrated number.
I'll go back to the original post:

quote:
I read an article in yesterdays tribune that a high school player, in a game against driscoll was allowed to throw 180 pitches. the final score was 15-14. this pitchers' team was down by 7 runs (if memory serves me).


I can maybe understand, if a kid is strong and effective, why the coach would keep a kid in. This kid had given up 14 runs. He could not have been that good. He could not have been that strong. I have no idea what this coach was thinking.

Don't get me wrong, 180 game pitches is rediculous regardless of whether he was effective or not, but to give up that many runs and be left in for that long? I don't get it.

I'll go back to what TR said earlier. Who was counting pitches. I have heard some on the board talk about ALL pitches counting toward the total. That would include bullpen and warmups. If that is the case, his actual pitch count would be far less. If he threw 8 warmups per inning (56) and 40 in the bull pen, that would be 96 warm-ups bringing his actual pitch count down to 84. Kind of doubt that though going 7 innings giving up 14 runs.

Parents should have said something.

Add Reply

Post
.
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×