Skip to main content

Had a strange one the other night, runner on 2nd, ball hit to CF, play at the plate, 8-3-2. Catcher blocks, sweeps, and when the ump gives the "show me the ball" point the catcher brings it up to show and it flips out of the glove, he juggles it, and when it finally hits the ground he calls the runner safe. now, the ball clearly came out of the glove AFTER the tag...so in my thought process its like a transfer and he's out. now what i asked the umpire, who said my catcher didn't have control, if after the juggle, had he caught the ball and it not dropped, would he have called the runner out?? needless to say he got the "deer in the headlights" look and told me "that's how I saw it Coach" and I told him that was fine, I just wanted to know if he had caught the juggle after the tag when showing you the ball would that *&%^$#% runner be out?? As he was clearly lost i decided not to overload him with 4 innings remaining so I calmly thanked him for helping that one make sense and returned to the dugout, thinking of that line from Summer Catch"..."get off your knees you're blowing the game"...

So fellow gurus...safe or out??
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

there was no transfer, it was a tag. but in my mind, it was the same principle, ball caught, then lost AFTER the fact ex. dp ball, say 4-6-3, SS drops ball on transfer, runner is out. kid was tagged at home, ball comes out of glove trying to show umpire (remember for the ball to come out it must have been in there at the time of the tag!) same idea jmho
This is a tough judgment for the umpire to make. But NFHS 8-4-2f note says "The ball is not securely held if it is dropped or juggled after the runner is touched."

so here whether the catcher had regained control after the juggle is irrelevant.

Now, the rules don't say exactly how long the fielder must maintain control of the ball after the tag, but here's where the definition/caseplay of 'catch' comes in (in my mind): NFHS 2.9.1 Sit A: "....if the ball is clearly in the fielder's possession and if some other new movement not related to the catch (nee tag) is made, and if the ball is fumbled during such new movement, the umpire will declare it a catch..."

And the definition of 'catch' clearly says the 'initial action must be completed' so there must be a definable boundary between the act of catching and subsequent moves by the fielder.


So, I could be wrong, but what I see is:

a. A ball dropped/lost as a result of the runner's action (contact) is not a valid tag.

b. A ball dropped after a tag MAY be a tag if it is a separate event from the tag (transfer, etc) entirely...for example, the catcher gets up, takes a few steps around in relaxed action, and then drops the ball. Common sense tells you this is a completed tag. But its umpire judgement.

In your case, without seeing it myself, I'd probably have no tag. The act of showing the ball is not sufficiently removed from the tagging action to call it a separate action.

But another umpire could see a definite boundary between the two....you just HTBT.
Last edited by LonBlue67

Add Reply

Post
.
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×