A couple of years ago my son played on what I considered a showcase team. The team was coached by an older baseball guy, who had coached on several different levels - he was old school.
I called it a showcase team because of the fact they rotated all players and none of the pitchers threw more than 2-3 inning's. The events they played in DID NOT contain elimination's or playoffs or championships...
At one of these showcase events (not a tournament), we played a team that particiated in all of the big tournaments and was stacked in terms of D1 committments. Their starter pitched for 6 innings... Our coached became really irate when this team bunted with our third baseman, obviously, back. He also raised hell that the other team was preventing players from being seen as they had stopped play on several occasions to argue with the umpires and challenge rulings.
I saw a post recently where a webster was concerned: after his kid had committed to a summer team he advised they continued to "sign" multiple additional pitchers, more pitchers than he felt was neccessary to allow sufficent opportunity to be seen. It dawned on me that the summer team he had signed up for was more than likely a tournament team, probably competing to win in tournaments as opposed to a true "showcase team" and so they needed to ensure sufficient arms to compete/win.
In the above example it's clear, the coaches were coaching based on two different event philospohy's, one to win first, one to showcase first.
Definetly you can showcase through tournament teams, the PG tournament events are certainly loaded with recruiters and scouts.
Is there such an animal as a "showcase" team? Is this the wrong terminology based on the higher profile tournament events wherby teams are there to win first as opposed to showcase first? Are showcase and tournament teams the same thing?
Your thoughts.....
Original Post
