TR
It makes for interesting discussion. Certainly the Coach and program have a right to want a kid that follows the rules, works hard, and studies (I guess this makes them good). Likewise, I guess Coaches are entitled to want parents that don't bother coaches and accept whatever the school and coach decide to do (I guess this is a good parent.)
If these are what makes a good kid and a good parent, and maybe there's more to it than this I'm not sure -- I have just one question - are they a package deal? In other words what if you have one but not the other?
I've known alot of what I called good kids and good parents then I've known some good kids with not good parents (according to this criteria) and I've known some good parents with not so good kids -- according to this criteria.
My concern, when I hear this sentiment from a college coach is it might, not necessarily say... I don't want to be bothered and a kid's talent and grades (observable objective criteria) aren't enough for me to take a chance on.
I don't know about anyone else, but I'm continually touched by the recurring story, and you hear it today just like you hear it 20, 30, 50 years ago, awhere a former player gives a testimonial about what he learned from his coach (college, HS etc.) that molded his character and changed him forever in a positive way.
Not every kid has great parents and lots of kids aren't as mature, or have learned the work ethic etc. that they should have...it doesn't mean they can't change, it doesn't mean it's their fault...but it probably means they will be more trouble than the finished polished product.
But again, I'm continually impressed with the coach that graduates his players, and when asked what his biggest accomplishment was he says seeing Joey leave here as a good citizen a much different man than when he came as a 17/18 kid.
ALA Bobby Knight
With this a background my thoughts are these:
I'm leary of a coach who has to do a background check on a talented player outside of grades
I'm leary of a coach that would leave a good kid (criteria above) out because he has PAINS for parents.
I'm leary of a coach that accepts hear say and second opinions without confronting the subject directly...spineless, lazy, suspect.
I guess I'm looking for the coach that says. I've checked up on your son and you as parents and heard this -- here's the deal. I found out X, Y, and Z and I need to hear from you about these things and we need to come to an agreement about them for the possible future of your son on our team.
Maybe it turns out that second hand opinions from HS coaches, Select coaches and others aren't exactly accurate...maybe it turns out they are exactly accurate. Either way to me this is the best way to approach it.
If the talent of the kid merits interest!!!!! this is key.
Don't know about you but I've seen instances where second hand opinions are often baseless or worse biased. We all know the story of the bad coach everyone knew who spread rumors about this kid or that parent. These people don't get jailed they run around saying whatever to whomever will generally listen. Not that they are the rule they are the exception.
Kids are kids I'd let Bobby Knight smack mine for days if it ultimately made him a better person. Kids need the benefit of the doubt.
Personally, if a kid can play I personally believe (foolish as I am) that there's a way to get that kid productive and I can do it - I've sometimes been wrong...but how fulfilling was it when I was right. Even when I was wrong I felt like I was the stonecutter hammering away at the rock...may not have seen it crack but maybe all my blows softened for the guy whose blow did crack it!
Not that I don't understand where coaches that don't want problems are coming from...after all who wants problems -- right!
How many of us have seen John Q spoiled little leaguer, High schooler grow up to be a very level headed good adult?