quote:
In 1999, Barry Bonds was already a Hall of Fame player. He had won three MVPs, and should have had a fourth. He hit .300 and averaged 36 homers a year in the '90s. He is such an intelligent hitter that teammates claim he knows every pitch that's coming, he's reduced the strike zone to the size of a nickel, and in the 21st Century has batted .306, .328, .370, .341 and .362, with on-base percentages of .440, .515. .582, .529 and .609. That's not chemical, that's simple greatness. But where he averaged 36 homers a year in his prime, he's averaged 52 a year in five years theoretically past his prime. WFAN's Christopher Russo interviewed a home run distance expert who claimed that prior to 2000, Bonds hit three homers longer than 450 feet; in the last five years, he has hit 26.
Interesting.....
Prior to 2000, who would you have considered the best hitter ever? Not Barry, he was a very, very good hitter, but not THE great one. In 1997 I was myself wondering what had ever happened to Barry Lamar Bonds, I hadn't seen too much of him on SportsCenter wearing the oversized forearm bands with his likeness on them, didn't see the large gold cross hanging from his ear, or the Darth Vader armor that allows him to hang over the inside part of the plate..... basically I wondered if he would retire soon, as most 35 year olds are begining to show signs of age and body fatigue, and drop in production in such a young sport.
Then a few years later I got my answer, man he was back and better and bigger than ever! Simply crushing the ball. Some of the 200+ walks may be attributed to the pitchers being only 60 ft away from a monster and not wanting a permanent dent in their forehead, or maybe they cared for their first baseman or second baseman, and didn't want to be responsable for denting their forehead as well.
I saw a stat this past weekend that showed by the age of 29 Bonds had 221 HRs(or so) and A-Rod had 348 HRs(or so, I can't find the article) by that same age.