I just saw an article about high school sports coverage in newspapers owned by Gannett; apparently they had been using AI to generate articles, and people had strong complaints so they have now stopped: https://www.axios.com/local/co...ett-ai-newsroom-tool.
My local paper has been owned by Gannett for a few years, they have axed the staff, and high school sports coverage has been decimated. Where they used to post an article and a box score for each (of 3) local high school baseball games, now we are lucky to get an item on one game a week (never with box). The reporter runs a "games this week" running column with scores.
This is such a shame. When my son was in HS, friends, neighbors, people we hadn't seen in a while would comment if he was mentioned (or better, had his picture) in the paper. Same with our youngest with golf. It really is something that can tie a smaller community together, if everyone is reading the same local paper.
So I'm torn about this AI business - on the one hand, I guess it meant that news was getting published; on the other hand, no human reporter had actually seen the games.
(looking to @iowamom23 for expert take on this!)