Skip to main content

Associated Press

Tuesday, September 9, 2008

CHICAGO -- Taking aim at a longstanding rite of passage for 16-year-olds, an influential auto safety group is calling on states to raise the age for getting a driver's license to 17 or even 18.

Adrian Lund, president of the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, a research group funded by the auto insurance industry, acknowledged the idea is "a tough sell," but noted that car crashes are the leading cause of death among teenagers.

"The bottom line is that when we look at the research, raising the driving age saves lives," Lund said. He plans to present the proposal today at the annual conference of the Governors Highway Safety Association in Scottsdale, Ariz.

Not surprisingly, a lot of teens hate the idea.

"I would really be upset because I've waited so long to drive," said Diamante White, a 16-year-old in Reading, Pa., who got her permit in July. She said learning to drive is a "growing-up experience."

Many parents agree. They also like not having to chauffeur their teens to school, sporting events and any number of other places.

"Do we really want our kids dependent upon parents for virtually everything until they go to college, can vote and serve their country?" asked Margaret Menotti, a mother in Uxbridge, Mass.

She argued that keeping teens from driving would only make them less responsible. Some parents also find it ironic that this conversation is happening just as a group of college presidents have proposed lowering the drinking age to 18.

Among other things, institute researchers have compiled decades' worth of data from New Jersey, the only state that issues licenses at 17. Various studies have shown that the overall rate of teens killed in crashes in New Jersey has been consistently lower than in some nearby states.

One study from the 1990s found that the rate of crash-related deaths among 16- and 17-year olds was 18 per 100,000 in New Jersey, compared with 26 per 100,000 in Connecticut. Those rates, researchers said, have dropped even further since both states instituted graduated driver's license programs.

Graduated licensing, which has become the standard across the country in the past 15 years, requires teens to spend more time driving with a parent or other responsible adult before they go solo. Though these rules are sometimes difficult to enforce, many states tie these more stringent standards to declining teen crash rates.

Barbara Harsha, executive director of the Governors Highway Safety Association, said she welcomes a debate on raising the driving age -- as do many who deal with public health.

"Getting the highest of the high-risk drivers away from the wheel probably isn't a bad idea," said Dr. Barbara Gaines, trauma director at Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC.

But she and others -- even the Insurance Institute officials who propose raising the driving age -- agreed it is not the only option.

Gaines noted that teen drivers in the Pittsburgh area who have committed moving violations must attend a "reality education" program at her hospital. They tour the intensive care unit and talk with young drivers who have been in serious crashes.

Dangerous Drivers

-- More than 5,000 U.S. teens die each year in car crashes.

-- The rate of crashes, fatal and nonfatal, per mile driven for 16-year-old drivers is almost 10 times the rate for drivers ages 30 to 59, according to the National Highway Safety Administration.

-- Many industrialized countries in Europe and elsewhere have a driving age of 17 or 18.
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

quote:
Originally posted by Fungo:
-- Many industrialized countries in Europe and elsewhere have a driving age of 17 or 18.


They are also hugely dependant on the public transportation systems. Many other countries don't have the land mass we do so driving and especially parking is a bother. It probably doesn't phase a European teenager to use the subway.
As a drivers education teacher I think this would bad idea. What they need to focus on is all of the elderly drivers who have no business being on the road right now. Teen drivers may not have the experience, but they do have the reaction time, vision, and reflexes that the people in their late 70's and 80's do not have. The fatality rate for people 75-85+ is much higher than the rate of 16-24 year olds.
If you move the driving up you are only delaying the age at which those drivers are inexperienced.

I understand that part of the issue is maturity, however at least at 16 kids are for the most part, still under their parents umbrella.

Many kids at 18 would get their license, move out of the house and still be an inexperienced driver, but with nobody to answer to.

Bad idea, IMHO.
If we really wanted to make the roads safer, retest (with a road test) ALL drivers on a regular basis. In my case, the last time I took a road test was when I was 16 - way too many years ago. I am not saying I am not a safe driver but shouldn't someone be validating that?

How about - if you get a point on your driving record (e.g. a moving violation) then you have to take a road test the next time your license comes up. If you have a clean record, you have to go in every other time (roughly every 10 years.)

08
If memory serves me correctly, I couldn't drive in NJ until I was 17.
Somewhere the age to get your permit became 15 with a year of practice with an adult and then legal to drive at 16 on your own. I beleive here in FL there are still restrictions on 16 year old drivers. Why not place those restrictions on all younger driver's until they reach a certain age (like not being able to drive after a certain time). That might cut down on those youngsters that drink and drive.
Then take away everyone's license for good who has ever has had a DUI, there are a LOT more adults around here who drink and drive than young drivers.
JMO.
Living in a state where many "mature" driver's can't see over the steering wheel of their car or hear a horn, or back up properly, or park properly anymore. I am in agreement with retesting when your license renews after a certain age, but the older folks have fought this, so make it mandatory for every driver.
The driving age in NJ is 17. Students have to take drivers ed. and take a written test. If they pass they must then pay for on the road driving lessons. At 16 they can get learners permit. After so many hours of paid behind the wheel lessons they then have to drive with 3 yr licensed driver who is over the age of 21 sitting in the front seat when they turn 17 they must pass a driving test and if they pass they are given a "Cinderella" license which means they can not drive after 11 pm until 5am and they can only drive with family members and/or one non family member in the car.
At the age of 18 they have a regular drivers license.
Last edited by njbb

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×