This has probably been mentioned here before, took a quick look and could not find. I was reading ESPN magazine article on Derek Jeter, the gist of the article revolved around the idea that Jeter was basically just lucky (I don't know either way about that), but it did make me wonder.
I am fortunate to live around a lot of great college baseball. One of the D1 colleges I have observed has a coach that for the most part relies on "lucky" players, you know the one that has the hits that always fall in. I'm trying to make this as short and concise as possible, but I noticed that every year several players are drafted that barely saw playing time, and the ones that transfer out almost always are more successful elsewhere. I've been told he is extremely superstitious.
So, if you are coach, who do you want? The lucky guy or the talented "toolsy" guy? (I'm not talking about "prospects", I mean for the here and now).
What really started me thinking about this, I heard a couple of guys, sitting in front of me at one of the games talking about this coach. I later found out one of the two was the pitcher's Dad, one was a MLB scout and I do not know who the other guy was. Basically, they decided most players coming in to this program would not develop further skills than the basic skills they came into the program with. I know superstitions are prevalent in baseball, but this coach has a overall winning percentage and not much trouble recruiting. Luck must work for him. ?
Original Post