Skip to main content

Since it's officially the off season now...
Here's a philosophical discussion for ya:

Physical talent aside...Are there certain personalities that are better suited to pitching vs hitting?

Some thoughts...
- to be a hitter you have to be able to deal with failing more than you succeed
- a pitcher stands alone on the mound
- a pitcher is pro-active, deciding the pitch and location
- a hitter is re-active, what do I do with that pitch
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Different kinds of focus. A pitcher has to maintain their focus over a long period of time. A hitter only has to focus for a few at bats per game.

A pitcher can usually get away with a few mistakes each game, yet they can lose a game on just one mistake.

One mistake by a hitter can result in a wasted at bat.

My son seems to be able to handle pressure much better as a pitcher than as a hitter. I'm not sure why.
Lets be honest the pitcher has the advantage. The ball is round the bat is round. He stands on a hill(mound). He gets 4 balls the batter 3 strikes. so look at it this way if I am a pitcher I am going to take advantage of this situation, I always told my pitchers that the ball was always in their court and be the boss. On the other hand hitters have to be smart. Know the strike zone lay off of bad pitches learn to work the count and study the pitcher for anything that gives his pitches away or learn his pattern and you can not do that if you do not pay attention when on the bench.
Will,
I'd be willing to bet that some kids with talent were never able to go out there and be the boss. One trait that most pitchers have is wanting to be responsible for what happens on the field. You know when you are pitching that it is all on your shoulders and while you are pitching you are totally involved in the game. That is what makes having to sit in the bullpen the rest of the time worthwhile.
I will not be held responsible for my opinion but here has how I have always told my son to approach hitting vs. pitching. The hitting approach: During every at bat you need to make adjustment in your approach. Many things come into play. The number of outs. . . runners on base. . . the predictability of the pitcher. . . and the most important is the count. An 0-2 approach is completely different than a 2-0. Focus while hitting? I say no. How in the world can a player not be focused standing in the batters box? If you want to focus on something, focus on trying to relax. Being over focused creates anxiety and tension, two of the biggest culprits in hitting.
Harvey Dorfman warns about trying to focus on the pitcher. I can’t tell you exactly what he says because my son has the book, but in the “Mental Keys to Hitting” he warns of the dangers in focusing too much and too early on the pitcher. Seems as if the brain is more receptive to pitch recognition in the first few seconds. Relax, see the ball, hit the ball.

In pitching I am a firm believer in the one pitch approach. There is only one pitch a player should focus on and that is the pitch he’s getting ready to throw. Of course the count is important as to pitch selection and location but there are two other people that have that responsibility, the pitching coach and the catcher. As a senior in high school my son threw a perfect game. He was unaware, as was I, that the game was a “perfect game” until it was over. I knew he had a no hitter going but the way I had taught him to approach the game was to ignore the emotions of the game and focus on one pitch.
My son is a two way player and I can tell you it is a major challenge trying to control the emotional rollercoaster associated with taking the ball on the mound and stepping into the batters box in front of five to ten thousand people.
Fungo

CADad is right on. . a great pitcher wants the ball. . the tougher the challenge the stronger the desire.
What makes the difference between good and bad at both positions is for me very simple:

PITCHER-- I want the kid who says to me " Coach I want the ball"

HITTER -- Give me the kid who wants to be up there with bases laodes two out and he being the winning run

Each takes a special focus as well as a special, as i call it, inner being-- some kids, despite all the talent will never be a good pitcher or hitter because of the lack of "inner being"--my own son threw 90's but he never wanted to be a pitcher-- he was a hitter and darn good one--he had the "inner being" and focus as a hitter.

This past weekend in Ft Myers we saw another example of focus and inner being by a hitter-- out shortstop made an error that let the other team back into the game and tied it--he led off the bottom of the last inning and all he did was hit a "bomb" to win it--that is a hitter with focus.

Not every kid with talent can be a great pitcher or hitter--it takes more than just talent--it takes "inner being"
Cadad

Could not agree with you more. Everybody talks about talen talen talent. It certainly helps. during my years I have seen kids who on the side have great stuff but when the bell rings nd they are on the mound they are somebody different. then you see some kids who when they throw you wonder how they get people out but they do. It is amazing how much of a kids mental make up and his approach to the game is responsible for success.
TR, et al.,
Good points. My son wants to face the best teams when he goes out on the mound. As a hitter he wants to face the best pitchers. He's the kid we want to see come to the plate in the middle of a close game with runners on base. We don't want him at the plate in the same situation in the last inning. We would want him on the mound in that situation. The talent hasn't changed between those situations but the mental approach has.

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×