I overheard some scouts talking at a recent showcase about multi sport athletes that play baseball. The bottom line was that they felt the multi sport athlete had a much larger "upside" than did the athlete that participated in only baseball. Does it stand to reason if a high school student/athlete spends 1/2 of his time working on baseball and 1/2 of his time on another sport he would have the potential to improve more after graduation than someone that has focused on baseball only. They felt that the only problem that they had with this idea was convincing MLB teams to draft the multi sport athlete and major colleges to sign those athletes because their was some risk that the athlete would not improve. What are your thoughts?
Original Post