I'm watching a game before my own, so I have no rooting interest.
B2 advances to 3B on a single. As he rounds 3rd, he inexplicably removes his helmet. Holding his helmet in his left hand, he dances back and forth, about 5 feet down the 3rd base line ... trying to induce a throw from F1, who has received the ball. This is the exact reason why the rules are in place, as this is dangerous ... particularly because the defensive team was so bad that a throw would have had a high probability of hitting the baserunner in the head.
Umpire doesn't stop play. But, when the action settles down (still live), umpire instructs the kid to put on the helmet. Not sure if this is an official warning per NFHS, but let's assume it is.
On the next pitch, the B3 is again taking his lead with his helmet in his left hand. I've really never seen anything like it ... the kid really liked holding his helmet.The umpires allowed it, though, without addressing it further.
My question is about the hypothetical. What if they had not allowed it? Everything I can find online only addresses the written rule and cases where the offending player is not actively on base. People correctly point out that it's not an out in FED to remove the helmet. It's a warning and then an ejection. People are fairly adamant about it NOT BEING AN OUT.
OK, understood, but what if the ejected player happens to still be on base? Is that also an out? Or, would the offending team simply replace the ejected player with a substitute who would also replace the ejected player on base (no out)?
I suppose there are other times a live baserunner could get ejected. Maybe jawing at a field umpire or an opposing defensive player to the point of getting tossed. Same situation, perhaps. Does the offensive team replace the ejected player on base with the same player who eventually replaces him in the lineup, or is it an out in addition to the ejection?
Thanks.