Skip to main content

Got into a big discussion with one of our local umpire association's leaders regarding NFHS rule 4-2-4. The rule states that unless the state association has adopted other game ending procedures, the game can be ended before five innings with consent of both coaches and the umpires.

The umpire I was talking to says that in Illinois we have "adopted" the 10-run mercy rule as the "game ending procedure". I said that the IHSA has not officially declared that this is the only game ending procedure, but that they have merely acknowledged NFHS rule 4-2-2.

States such as Missouri and Ohio have explicitly declared game ending procedures. In the case of Ohio, they say that 4-2-4 can be used, but only during the regular season. Missouri has an optional 2 1/2 hour time limit.

Having not said anything about 4-2-4 or offered alternate game ending procedures, can we not use 4-2-4 as a legitimate game ending procedure?
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

quote:
Originally posted by dash_riprock:
If both coaches want to end the game, I'll help them pick up the bats.


I know there is a bit of humor in Dash's response, but it is nonetheless absolutely the only way go, regardless of 4-2-4.

If both coaches are determined not to play, why on earth would any umpire try to make them play?
quote:
Originally posted by Jimmy03:
If both coaches are determined not to play, why on earth would any umpire try to make them play?


As an umpire, I agree. If both coaches come to me and say "We're ready to end this thing," I'm not disagreeing.

My answer came as if the coaches came to me and said, "How can we end this thing?"

Add Reply

Post
.
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×