Skip to main content

quote:
For all the USC games I saw last year, Oropesa was using an 2011 TPX Omhaha. All the other kids used the Nike's.


He used the TPX for the first third of the season.He uses a bigger bat and Nike didnt make it.Nike eventually made him the size bats he used and he used Nike the rest of the year.They didnt have his size bat at the beginning of the year.
I'm sure the Nike teams have already received 'samples' from other bat manufacturers.

Is a bat deal too sweet to pass up, rather than allow players to use any bat they feel comfortable with?

Would teams locked into bat contracts cry foul if a non-sponsored/no deal team were to win CWS using bat variations of five different brands?
Last edited by AntzDad
quote:
Originally posted by TPM:
quote:
Originally posted by Sdlefty:
The entire BBCOR transition was to fast. It did not allow the bat manufacturers enough time to put out quality BBCOR product. Nike is not a bat company, so we should not be suprise by this outcome.

We will see the true bat manufacturers begin to put quality BBCOR product in the marketplace, and give our kids a great bat to swing. Easton, LS, Demarini.

Lastly, a bat is a personal preference for a player. They have to feel confident and comfortable in what they are swinging. When a college kid is forced to swing a particular bat, things can get tough.

Lefty...


Good post lefty.
Coaches DO NOT necessarily have to use one specific manufacturer for anything, but some do because THEY (the coaches) get paid to do so. So I don't think the entire blame should be on Nike, but rather also those who took money for their own gain.

Is it true that the new bats have been found to be altered in CA (HS) and that there will be penalties if umpires find bats that have been, the penalty will lie on the coach, not the player?


From what I saw last year the CA HS kids used a waiver bat. I think it was a CF4? Any penalties were placed on the coach. I never saw it happen. I did not hear of any bats being altered, as most used the CF4 waiver bat.
quote:
quote:
Originally posted by Sdlefty:
The entire BBCOR transition was to fast. It did not allow the bat manufacturers enough time to put out quality BBCOR product. Nike is not a bat company, so we should not be suprise by this outcome.

We will see the true bat manufacturers begin to put quality BBCOR product in the marketplace, and give our kids a great bat to swing. Easton, LS, Demarini.

Lastly, a bat is a personal preference for a player. They have to feel confident and comfortable in what they are swinging. When a college kid is forced to swing a particular bat, things can get tough.

Lefty...



The bat companys had plenty of time to figure it out they all dropped the ball on this.

http://fs.ncaa.org/Docs/rules/...nnouncement.9.05.pdf

http://www.ncaa.org/wps/portal...Standards/index.html

If I read all this right they knew it was goining to happen in 2008.

Add Reply

Post
.
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×