Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Several of us "baseball dads" talked @ this very topic last night over a few, ahem, "adult" beverages, and the group view seemed to be that turnouts were about the same or lower than in previous years...
FWIW, district 4,10,& 16 Little Leagues' participation rates are rumored to be rather flat, yet Lisa L. @ NVTBL thinks they may crack the 200 team # this year or next...
Any ideas on how to improve the #s???
I asked son about this. He said 10 were cut from Varsity and 20 from JV (no separate 9th grade team). Several players "self cut" before the end of tryouts. Several that were cut from Varsity could have been stars at other schools. I don't have too much past experience in this area, but the numbers coming out for tryouts seem to be up this year.
Superball, since some players had to be cut due to sheer numbers, and when most of the guys cut have played baseball since they were 5, they would have been welcome additions at neighboring schools that have struggled recently. When you have a bunch of guys that have to move up to Varsity, and only a few that graduated the prior year, plus add in a few transfers, it doesn't leave much room.
That's true, Keewart, and that is a problem, but it sure is a nice problem (for your program and for your coach). I am wondering (and I guess Superball is too, as well as some others) how your school program is so fortunate to be overstocked with phenomenal players, that several of the cut players could have been "stars at other schools." Is your school a public or private one? If public, what District do you play in?
Yep, nice problem to have. Alot of the players when they were younger played together on a local travel team. But as teens do, they get involved in other things or other sports and less time to baseball. Many of the current varsity players, but not all, do play on good teams during the summer/fall. Plus, it could have been an "overloading" of players in one class by the coach, which does happen some years.
Loudoun County charges $100 per player per sport and that goes to either the school or the school system, not to the sport...any individual spirit wear or required gear that the kids get to keep (like hats) are paid for completely separately.

We had some kids "self-cut" this year - possibly due to the $100, but more likely due to the realization of available playing time. I'm kind of disappointed that at least 3 seniors decided not to play as they didn't play much last season...

I honestly don't have a problem in paying the fee to help cover costs of extra curricular activities, but I do not feel it is fair to levy the fee on sports teams only. I think all the activities should have the fee - like band, drama, math club, etc. It can get expensive with two kids playing multiple sports...

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×