Skip to main content

Beating a dead horse here, and egging on a few folks, in the having fun sense of course, but take that big payroll elsewhere Georgie...and not into the Series. What are we talking, 5 years in a row without a Series title??? Heads surely will roll.

Saving grace-the guys they cut loose go straight to Medicare, no Team supplied retiree insurance issues.

While I do in all honesty like Joe Torre, and quite a few of the pin stripers seem like genuinely good guys, if you'd give me $200 million to buy what I wanted, I could put together (buy) enough talent to be respectable.



Whatever happened to the Queen of the Empire?
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Three years x $17 million to 41 year old Randy Johnson. I think Carl Pavano got 4 years at $12 million each. Kevin Brown is still getting huge jack. Jeret Wright got about $10 million a year. All bad deals so far.

Without 17 year minor leaguer Aaron Small who went 10-0 as a Yankee, and Shawn Chicon, they would have missed the playoffs all together.

They have topped the crest of the hill and head down the other side.
After watching ARod in the playoffs, how good do they need to be to overcome that choke batting third? I mean he will win the MVP and he went 2 for 20 something plate appearences with zero RBI in the ALDS, for $25,000,000 a year?

I'm glad he's in NY. At least he'll never hurt the Sox in the post season.
Last edited by Dad04
In my small way of thinking there were some core players there that were absolutley responsible for winning all those rings. Pettit was one and he is gone. Jeter is still one and you saw how he produced last night. To an extent, David Wells was one. The one they miss the most imho, is Paul O'Neil. He was the best clutch hitter in baseball. They have not won a World Series since he retired.
ClevelandDad's point is well taken. And what do all of those guys, with the exception of O'Neill, have in common? All home grown talent. While there will be exceptions from time to time (last year's Red Sox, though only to a point), I don't think a team can win, much less win long term, without building a strong base of talent from within and then supplementing that talent with shrewd trades and rare free agent signings (Red Sox again--Dan Duquette was quite good at this. Theo Epstein, maybe not so good at that). Doesn't it seem that those "blockbuster" signings tend to backfire more often than not (again, Vlad is the exception rather than the rule. I'm sure Mets fans will agree, at least insofar as Beltran is concerned).
It is interesting how the focus remains on the Red Sox and Yankees and Braves - regarding dollars spent when they dont win it all.

But no team in modern history can match the NY Mets for the lethal combination of money spent and ballgames lost.

They are simply - the best at it.

I say - bring back Mo Vaughn, Jeremy Burnitz and Joe McEwing - and trade away Pedro for a bag of doughnuts and two bags of espresso coffee - and lets get the 2006 party started.

Wink
Last edited by itsinthegame
Its one thing to excell over the course of a 162 game schedule. Its another thing to excell in the playoffs when the pressure is on to produce right now. There are clutch guys then there are guys that are not. Jeter Clutch. Arod not clutch. Does that mean that Arod is not a great baseball player? Of course not the numbers he puts up during the regular season speak for themselves. But hitting a dbl with the go ahead run on second base in the 8th inning in June against the Blue Jays when your up 8 games in the race is alot different than doing it in a game 5 of a 5 game series. The Yankees are the most talented team in baseball. They just are not the best team.
quote:
But hitting a dbl with the go ahead run on second base in the 8th inning in June against the Blue Jays when your up 8 games in the race is alot different than doing it in a game 5 of a 5 game series.


Coach May
The way the American League East ended should reaffirm that every game means something. Head to head competition counts. You know the Yankees struggled for some reason with the Devil Rays and the Blue Jays owned the Red Sox.
The Red Sox came into the playoffs as the top hitting team. What happened?

Now in playoffs, I agree that big players come up big. So how come so many didn't? Not just Arod. What kind of advantage to these teams have with scouting reports on hitters and what kind of advanatge to they have when the starting rotation can execute the plan? The Angels found a way to win even though Figgins was shut down and Vlady was too? I remember thinking before the start of Game 3...hmmmmmmm...Garrett Anderson is 0-8. Good.
He's not anymore, but why?

Did you see the 18 inning game and the relief pitching that went how many shut out innings?
Amazing, wasn't it?
I'm a small market guy that has always despised the Yanks, always have, always will. But, there is a lot of hindsite in these posts. The Angels series was as close as they come. If the Yankees would have won we would blame it on the big name salaries. All of a sudden A-Rod slumps for 5 games and we say he choked, A-rod you had a nice 162 games. Johnson didn't come through? he was unhittable out of the pen on a couple days rest, there's heart. The Yankees won 95 games, and I'm glad they lost the last 3 of 5 but to say they did not have any heart is pushing it. They are ultimate professionals. Heart does play a part in the equation but I can think of many cases that the best team lost because the other team played better that day.

I still hope the Yankees never win another game, but, those high price guys did not get where they are because they can't win. Every MLB team is 1 or 2 players and a stroke of luck away from the playoffs. Nobody is giving the Angels kudos for winning we are looking for ways to blame the Yanks for losing. Instead of being vindictive on the players let's focus our disgust on King George and his attempts to ruin the game.

If St Louis loses to the Astros, are they chokers with no heart? If they lose we better be consistant and call them that because on paper they are a better team.
Last edited by rz1
Gotwood,
On the surface and as a Yankee hater I would agree with that statement. But, if I were to come up to you, after a game, as a fan, and say "Gotwood, you lost because the other team had more heart". After they picked me up off the ground you would say "rz, You are just a spectator, you do not personally know the heart and soul of this team".

My point. Heart and soul cannot be measured in front of the tube. If Joe Torre came out and said "we had no heart", I would buy the statement. If you or I say it, it's an unsubstaniated opinion.
Last edited by rz1
wow is this a tough crowd laugh
Never been a Yankee fan, but I've seen teams do alot worse after spending tons of money (Dodgers, Mets and Orioles immediately come to mind). The Yanks may not have won it all, but they are in the hunt every year. I know that means nothing to George, but it's something IMO to be competitive year after year after year. (Absent Kirk Gibson's miracle flip of the bat in '88) the Dodgers, for example, are in about a 25 year dry spell, I think the Dodgers have already been mathmatically eliminated for next year Wink .
Last edited by HeyBatter
The Yankees pitched well enough to win. Especially in game 5 the one that decided the series. Its not like the Angels had a healthy Schilling and Pedro thrown at them. The reason they lost is they could not get the clutch hits when they needed them. Jeter delivered. Who else delivered? Great pitching will negate great hitting. But did the Angels throw great pitching at the Yankees? I dont think so. It was good but not great. The Yankees are the more talented team. Look at the line up. Its an all star line up. I agree the pitching is average with the exception of Johnson when he is on and of course that stud closer. But who is the Angels stud starter. No better than the Yankees on the hill. They were the better team not the more talented team. But it doesnt matter because the better team won the series.
Coach May,
The Yankees lost to a mediocre hitting team because the other team had better pitching. This was true in the season series and it was true in the playoffs.

Stud starter! The Angels had the probable Cy Young award winner in Colon and John Lackey who may have been a better pitcher this season than Colon for stud starters. They also had a pretty good if inconsistent rookie in Santana and a couple solid veterans in Washburn and Byrd. Add to that Kelvim Escobar in the bullpen along with Shields and Rodriguez and you aren't going to find a much better staff in baseball.

For most of the season the Yankees had somebody pretending to be Randy Johnson, Shawn Chacon and Mike Mussina benefiting from all that hitting. I'd say that Chacon was their only legit playoff starter despite Mussina's performance in game 1. Of course they had Rivera but they have to get to him. If the Yankees had beaten the Angels they would have lost to Chicago. I'd say there are 4 to 6 teams with more talent than the Yankees if you're willing to consider Cleveland and Boston.
rz1

What a great post.
Whoever you do cheer for is lucky to have you as a fan. I completely understand your feelings about the Yankees because I mirror those feelings for the Red Sox...lol.

Mike Timlin, Billy Meuller, Tim Wakefield, John Olerud...are all guys I have alot of respect for. As I get older I am sorry to say that I feel baseball fans in general are a pretty fickle bunch. Never used to see it that way but your point about hindsight and the disparaging comments "after the fact" are just pretty unfortunate. No one can measure the heart of those players.

I thank you for your classy commentary.
Last edited by Chill

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×