Over-officiating or good call

I would say no interference.

This should not be interference since he is NOT making an intentional effort to interfere since he was not really even in fair territory. I only call this if the player is running on the grass basically.

If he is to the left of the line then you need to call it, the grass is too lenient. In this case I probably have nothing because at some point he has to touch first and it sounds like it was that time.

MT - you are talking about most of the body being to the left of the line - not a toe or two right?

I would and have called for a "foot" the appendage, not inches, clearly outside the line to the left and to the right. I had one this weekend that coach wanted me to call but I said no.

That was a bunt up the 3b line, and with the BR's left foot clearly to the left of the foul line on his last stride with his right foot going to the bag the ball whistles passed his left ear, no contact with the ball, F3 misses it and it sails into right, scores the runner from second and BR reaches 2nd. Sorry skip I got nothing.

Had one similar tonight. Dropped third strike, BR's last stride with left foot going to the bag, right foot clearly in the lane the throw drills the BR in the left calf, sorry skip I got nothing there either.
The runner has to physically leave the lane to touch the bag as the bag is outside the lane, if he
is striding to the bag with the right foot, guess what? Not only is his left foot, but most of his body is to the left of the lane, IMO you gotta let that go. Prior too the last stride, any thing "clearly outside and on the ground" will get the BR rung up.

JJK seems to be saying the same as me. I agree that you can't bang an out right at the bag for crossing into fair. However, if the foot is on the ground the left of the foul line then he is subject to a call. He still has to actually interfere but it requires only a foot not a major part of his body.