Dad10, sounds like you have some issues. The question was about the impact of grooming on the recruiting process. As few of our members are college recruiters, our personal opinions have no power; as many of us have had our sons signed, our personal experience can be helpful.
Recruiters have to see a player, be interested by his play, and judge how he might fit into his program. Keep in mind that that last component is complicated, involving everything from academics to finances to team chemistry to needs at that position/can he be converted to a position we do need. Keep in mind these decisions are made in woefully limited time and across a whole lotta players. Any little thing a player can do to improve his chances can mean the difference between playing in college or not, or playing at the dream school or not.
Of course being clean cut doesn't make anybody a good person/ballplayer. Of course choosing an individual style doesn't make anyone a bad person/ballplayer. And of course a college recruiter doesn't have the time to delve deeply into many players he looks at, so appearances (as in, from the stands) will weigh heavily.
Had the question been running out to your position every time or starting the game with a clean uni (other 'surface' components), would you have included the comparisons to wife beating and swearing at umpires?
The thing is, there are many quality players. And none of them are owed a shot at a team, be it hs, travel, college, or pro.