Skip to main content

I hate the word PROJECTABLE.  It's been tough for my boys.  Their great pitchers but unfortunately, they are not tall kids and that's what these coaches want.   Why does coaches take kids that our "projectable" but no work ethic and arm care routine?  I would think that would be very important, but most these coaches just want the tall kids.

WHERE'S THE COACHES THAT Love THE Boys that have tremendous work ethic? 

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

@lucky4three

I understand what you are saying, and I probably uttered those words more than a few times 10-15 years ago.  It is probably even more so today given the transfer portal situation, and  JUCO popularity.   Coaches can be more selective with their recruits.  To me, this means your son has to be realistic and understand the marketplace better.

Years ago, I figured out there was a frame low water mark for D1 P5 at about 6'2".  The feedback my son (RHP 6'1") got from those coaches referenced his frame more than once.   I don't know what that ceiling is today, but I suspect it is taller.   He had the velocity, and pitch selection of a D1 P5 recruit but he didn't have the frame projectability.  He had three players from his travel team go to UVA.  Two were RHPs and both were very big boys in the 6'3"-6'4" 210-220lbs range.  One of them had a similar variety of pitches to my son and the other just threw 2 pitches.  My son was 6'1" 180lbs.  He got no recruitment love at UVA.   It was the same at Virginia Tech.   Reality struck.   He moved on and found serious interest and offers in the D1 Mid-Majors, Ivy & Patriot League as well as some D3 HA programs.

If your son is a great pitcher as you advocate, then he needs to be persistent to get in front of the right coaches until he finds the best fit.  This doesn't happen overnight.    We went through a few different phases of recruitment where the only thing that changed was our strategy or approach.   You have to be willing to try something different when it becomes apparent your son is either not get positive responses or targeting the wrong audience or both.  My son went on to have a great college career and experience, and their was no question it was the right fit.

Good luck!   

Last edited by fenwaysouth

Yes. My kids are fortunate they do play at the next level. I got 1 at JUCO school down south and 1 at a D2 school in Midwest looking to find a school for his Junior and Senior year.  Would love for him to find a school in Midwest but it's probably going to be down south, but he doesn't care where he just wants to go where they need him.

Lot's of schools didn't even respond when he tells them his height (5'10). Both my kids are high 80's consistently, both have hit 90-91 a couple times during games.  Have an awesome arm care routine, in the weight room every day. But lots these schools it's not enough.  If they do get a response, straight tell them - you're not projectable. 

There's more to pitching than height and being "projectable" to throw 95.  Pitching is an art.  You got to be able to hit your corners, nice change-up, keeping batter off balance, command and yes throwing in the mid-90s is great but it's not everything.

When my son was 14 a coach saw my son at a scrimmage.  After he asked him how tall his parents and grandparents were.  He told him that coaches look for high butts and long arms.  My son's nickname since he was 15 has been "Mr. Projectable".  One of the older players at his club said that and it stuck.

The best thing was when a coach told him that "projection means very little if you don't work at it."  Last summer my son looked at me and said, "I wish I'd stop growing so I could put on weight." I looked at him and said, "Little buddy...you can say that to me but NO other pitcher on your team wants to hear the 6'5" kid bitch about how he's still growing and you're already topping 92."

Projectability might get your foot in the door but at the end of the day baseball is a production business.

@lucky4three posted:

Yes. My kids are fortunate they do play at the next level. I got 1 at JUCO school down south and 1 at a D2 school in Midwest looking to find a school for his Junior and Senior year.  Would love for him to find a school in Midwest but it's probably going to be down south, but he doesn't care where he just wants to go where they need him.

Lot's of schools didn't even respond when he tells them his height (5'10). Both my kids are high 80's consistently, both have hit 90-91 a couple times during games.  Have an awesome arm care routine, in the weight room every day. But lots these schools it's not enough.  If they do get a response, straight tell them - you're not projectable.

There's more to pitching than height and being "projectable" to throw 95.  Pitching is an art.  You got to be able to hit your corners, nice change-up, keeping batter off balance, command and yes throwing in the mid-90s is great but it's not everything.

I agree with everything you've stated.  I get it, it is a very hard pill to swallow.   For my son, it didn't really matter once he was in college.  He had no professional baseball aspirations and he got to start on the bump every weekend.   He played baseball because he loved it. 

There are exceptions out there.  Billy Wagner, Marcus Stroman, Tim Lincecum, Fernando Rodney come to mind.  Pedro Martinez was not tall and neither was Trevor Hoffman.   If you are willing to pursue it, these are examples and you can examine their baseball paths for ideas.   I just think it is very much the exception, and you need to keep looking for programs that are looking for someone like your son even if it is a slight step down from where he is today (in order to keep playing).  In some ways, I think my son did compromise a little bit on his college baseball level, but it didn't matter as he had other priorities in mind.

Good luck!

My son is only a freshman but it's definitely a hard pill to swallow that a kid can do absolutely nothing about his DNA height wise and with sports at a higher level that is very much a factor. I don't share these thoughts with my son but it's frustrating. I imagine for a pitcher it's really tough. On the bright side in our area I can easily think of   4 or 5 kids who played D2 and D3 baseball who are under 5'9" and got reasonable playing time.

@lucky4three, If you are perceived to be undersized as a pitcher (under 6’-2”) you are at a disadvantage. That’s just a fact. However there are coaches that pay more attention to performance than size. Those are the coaches you need to find. At this point in time they tend to be younger coaches who put more emphasis on stuff than size. To them stuff is the separator. To get their attention you will need to show them that your son has a pitch (or pitches) that do something better than average. My suggestion is to get Trackman readings on a bullpen as soon as possible. Then get someone that understands how to interpret the data to explain it to you. What you are hoping for is something you can sell. Like a high spin rate FB that really holds it’s plane. Or an off speed pitch that has an unusual amount of movement. If one of those things exists, and you can prove it up with data, that becomes your selling point. And the headline that you lead with when approaching college coaches. They are much more likely to respond to that than the old tired dialogue that coaches hear from every parent about their kid’s pinpoint control and warrior mentality. Because more often than not that argument is very subjective and parents are biased. Can’t argue with science that’s real. It’s much more persuasive.

Lucky … I’ll ignore the projectability. I’m guessing throwing high 80’s, maxing 91 they’re not looking for baseball after college. Being JuCo and transfer players they want to get it right when they make their move. They should be looking for the best possible baseball experience and education regardless of division level.

Are your son’s the top pitchers on their staff? Pitchers who have proven they can get college hitters out will get a chance regardless of size as long as the recruiting coach believes he can get hitters out at the level he’s coaching. It’s why movement and command matters in addition to velocity.

There’s a poster on here with a son heading into his 5th year season in a ranked program. He’s 5’11”. He’s not the star of the staff. He hasn’t been drafted. But he understands his role and is very successful at it.

Know your fit. Know your role. Good luck!

@adbono posted:

@lucky4three, If you are perceived to be undersized as a pitcher (under 6’-2”) you are at a disadvantage. That’s just a fact. However there are coaches that pay more attention to performance than size. Those are the coaches you need to find. At this point in time they tend to be younger coaches who put more emphasis on stuff than size. To them stuff is the separator. To get their attention you will need to show them that your son has a pitch (or pitches) that do something better than average. My suggestion is to get Trackman readings on a bullpen as soon as possible. Then get someone that understands how to interpret the data to explain it to you. What you are hoping for is something you can sell. Like a high spin rate FB that really holds it’s plane. Or an off speed pitch that has an unusual amount of movement. If one of those things exists, and you can prove it up with data, that becomes your selling point. And the headline that you lead with when approaching college coaches. They are much more likely to respond to that than the old tired dialogue that coaches hear from every parent about their kid’s pinpoint control and warrior mentality. Because more often than not that argument is very subjective and parents are biased. Can’t argue with science that’s real. It’s much more persuasive.

^ this

I was just about to add that your boys need Trackman data.

Because without standout speed (95+), or natural height, your boys will need to push a bit more to prove they can contribute at the next level. Their existing coaches should be able to help market them if their season stats and Trackman numbers are solid.

@lucky4three posted:

I hate the word PROJECTABLE.  It's been tough for my boys.  Their great pitchers but unfortunately, they are not tall kids and that's what these coaches want.   Why does coaches take kids that our "projectable" but no work ethic and arm care routine?  I would think that would be very important, but most these coaches just want the tall kids.

WHERE'S THE COACHES THAT Love THE Boys that have tremendous work ethic?

I'm going to assume based on your post your sons are pitchers. So, at every level there will be an amount of "projectability". There will be players that get opportunities you might not think they deserve. But at the end of the day what coaches really love is results. If your players can throw with velocity, control, and command multiple pitches, and get people out, they'll get playing time that "projectable" players that don't produce won't.

At the end of the day sports are a results-oriented endeavor.

When it comes to D1, the grinders with great work ethic are all over the place, whether they are 6'2 or 5'6. Many, many choices. As a D3 coach, we get all the 5'6 grinders and are happy they fall to us. But even all the "work ethic" kids don't work out. The ones that excel at D3 usually transfer out in a year or 2, but that's what good D3 programs that stress development can expect.

'

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×