I have been reading with great interest the thread started by Fungo on "Over Recruiting." (Of course I read all of Fungo's posts with great interest.
Together with that thread, I have read the thread started by Anxiousmom about her son, a NMSF with ACT scores that are pretty darn great.
I don't read too many threads where mention of my son being DI isn't included.
And I am very present to that goal to which we all agree..."Fit."
Putting these together,I read about parents seeking the best scholarship amount, at the best DI baseball school, with the best "guarantee" of playing, or at least getting a guarantee of a roster spot, and then having a "good fit."
When I read all of this, I wonder if we as very concerned parents are trying to control the risk which we cannot control when our son's get to college, play in Summer Wood Bat leagues or happen to get drafted out of high school.
Certainly, I completely support researching as carefully as possible the available options. Is it important to know if a school starts every Fall with 50 or more and ends up with 35.
Certainly it is important to know whether the coach pulls scholarships, and other such items.
However, realistically, I wonder if parents, for the most part, are trying to control risks of recruiting they cannot control.
Those risks include the real talent of your son, how he transitions to the rigors of college life, college academics, and college baseball, and perhaps, most importantly, how he transitions his mental framework to adapting to each of those challenges and excelling in a foreign environment, when we as parents are not there to protect them or "control" the "risks."
Would we as parents be better off trying to educate our son's on the challenges that lie ahead as contrasted with attempting to "control" what lies ahead, for them?
Would we as parents be providing a better process by letting our son's know we cannot control what lies ahead and that it is only controlled by their dedication and talent, in the classroom and on the field?
Would we as parents be better at what we do by recognizing we are trying to control risks that we cannot?
Would we as parents be better at what we do by realizing DI, a baseball scholarship, or other similar items are "risks" that can set our son's up for "failure?"
Would we as parents answer these questions differently if we are looking at them as I do, in the "rear" view mirror, or as the parent of a 2009/2010 recruit?
Original Post