quote:
Originally posted by baseball168:
Recently this issue has come up with one of my son's teammates, as a school has been asking him if he would need money to attend the school (his parents are relatively wealthy).
My question is whether colleges truly play the best players, as most coaches say, or whether they play the scholarship players (at least give them the opportunity)? It makes sense that coaches want to get the most out of their investment, but I know they want to win. I'm sure most coaches would eventually play the non-scholarship player if he continued to out-perform the scholarship player, but I was just wondering how this affects players and how they are treated differently based on this.
This was discussed in the thread regarding scholarships/economy.
Obviously, this is happening and most likely will be more and more of a consideration as time goes on if our economy does not improve. Coaches will take into consideration who can afford the tuition and who cannot when asking players to come play at his program and give out scholarships accordingly. This will have to be a decision of the player and his parents who will be footing the bill.
This has nothing to do with over recruiting.
Bottom line is the coach plays the best players, with or without scholarship.
If you want an example, take my player, on almost a full scholarship, he certainly didn't get the weekend start over those getting less, he had to earn it and it took 2 years to do so. He was more or less a seasoned player, not put into the role until he was ready.