Skip to main content

I started making a list of colleges to help my son get an idea of where he might like to go and sort of lost control of myself. So here are a few little tidbits from my research.
I have a spread sheet with 386 colleges and universities with the number of LHPs by class. List includes DI, DII, DIII, and NAIA. Note some colleges do not put positions on their rosters so I do not have data for all schools.
FR SO JR SR TOTAL
284 178 269 134 865

4 schools had no LHPs.
1 school only had 13 players on their team.
Last edited {1}
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

What an interesting piece of work - how do you find the time Smile

Unless the data is really incomplete - e.g. more than 50% of the schools don't list by position or provide "handedness", there are still far fewer LHPs than I would have thought. Assuming 50% of schools did not declare - you would still only have roughly 4 LHP per school - on a staff of 15ish... There is hope for my LHP Smile
quote:
Originally posted by dad4boys:
This might get the discussion going. As I reviewed the 2005 rosters, some colleges have started posting the 2006 rosters and the number of pitchers coming and going is remarkable. Like a revolving door at some top SEC schools.


I am not sure I understand the point of your post.
It is not uncommon to find large pitching rosters from schools that belong in the SEC, ACC, etc.
LHPs that are able to compete at the higher levels are a rarity. You might be interested to know that if given a chance and don't perform, they are often replaced with an RHP that can get the job done.
Last edited by TPM
grateful ...
quote:
Wow....that is only 2.24 LHP per school......if my math is correct.

Most schools must have about 12-16 pitches on their rosters, I would guess.


If your figures are correct, then the 2.24 per school with 12-16 pitchers on the rosters is well above the normal percentage for lefties in the general population. Based on some reading that I did after looking at this thread, approximately 10% of the general population are lefties. At 2.24 per school, you are looking at a range of 14% to 18.7% of the pitchers being lefthanded. Kind of interesting ...
dad4, kudos for the effort Smile

but, sometimes too much info is counterproductive


seriously tho, (while you're breaking down the other positions) have your son pick about a dozen schools that he may be interested in, based on academics, location, conference, size, chicks etc - and have him start sending intro letters

relax and let it play out



.
Last edited by Bee>
quote:
Originally posted by micdsguy:
quote:
FR SO JR SR TOTAL
284 178 269 134 865


I don't understand the large number of juniors.
You sure you didn't reverse the sophs and juniors?

The schools rosters I've seen have lots of freshmen and sophomores and far fewer upperclassmen

You see that at some schools who rely on JUCO transfers to round out the positions that they can't get filled from the HS signings. The #1 recruiting class in the nation (reportedly) is South Carolina. SC is bringing in 13 freshman and 10 JUCO transfers. Situations like that support the Freshman/Junior weighting, but it still may be an aberation depending on where you check.

It would be interesting (not sure if it would be informative) to see numbers broken down by regions or states. The number of programs per state is so variable, including the number of instate JUCO's that I feel that you can't get a "generalized" picture. Wake Forest, for years, had a 'pipe-line' to California for the California JUCO's and transfers. With their new coach, I'm not sure if that trend is continuing.

Every school is so different, it's hard to predict anything based on overall numbers. Too much variation, but very interesting.
Last edited by HiHardHeat
About 12% of the population is left handed. 18% of all major league players throw left handed according to Baseball-Almanac.com. But the great majority are pitchers.

But baseball is a right handed sport

Lefties have an advantage only at 1st base and pitcher. There are almost no lefties catching, SS, 2nd or 3rd base. Outfield is pretty neutral.

My guess is that southpaws become far more experienced on the mound than righties, who have more position options. From grade school on, a lefty will be directed toward pitching rather than other positions. That alone may eventually give them an edge in picking off runners, fielding the position and throwing trick pitches.
Tiger Paw Mom,
I'm thinking I must have misunderstood your statement:

"LHPs that are able to compete at the higher levels are a
rarity."

Uh....no....statements made in previous threads are absolutely correct. LHPs ARE a dream come true for coaches and perform EXTREMELY well at the higher levels. Your statement that "If they don't perform, they are often replaced with a RHP that can get the job done......is actually true of any pitcher lefty OR righty. Of course, a coach will and should replace a pitcher who doesn't perform. But, that pitcher will be replaced by whatever pitcher the coach feels will be able to get the job done in that situation....not necessarily a RHP. Most coaches will consider several factors as they contemplate substituting for a pitcher who is struggling or not performing up to the coaches' expectations. Among these factors......They look at where the opposing team is in their batting order and what types of pitches the next batter usually goes after. Baseball coaching is a bit more complicated than just giving a lefty a "chance" and then going back to his righties because they get the job done. Most coaches will from time to time coach match ups Lefty pitcher to lefty batter, etc. Go down the lineup of your son's team and ask if they would rather go up to bat against a lefty or right-handed pitcher. Even a lefty pitcher who is struggling will usually cause more problems for the average hitter than an RHP. There are fewer lefty pitchers in the world because there are fewer lefties in the world. It is just that simple!
Know quite a few lefties who got the job done in HS, not college. I may have misinterpreted the post, that is why I asked.
Despite my post, I think that trying to figure out all of this information in percentages, on spread sheets, etc. is just too much.
If your son is good, lefty, righty, whatever, he most likely will play college baseball.

Savannah no one is giving him a hard time.

I suggest to follow Bee's advice. You have your son pick out the schools he is intrested and go for it.
We baseball folk love our stats and numbers (as I was saying to Billy Beane only the other day Wink), but I also question the relevance of so broad an undertaking.

Narrowed to the schools your son is interested in and qualified for, analysis of their rosters and history is valuable. But that doesn't lead logically to analyzing the universe of college baseball.
I’m with TRHit and Bee...Lets BREATH a little... but at the same time I think ALL “involved” parents are guilty of being “over-involved”. That’s better than not being involved!! Savannah, I do take this exchange as constructive. Dad4boys has confessed he is getting a little carried away with the stats and numbers. This statistical information is useful to parents in some cases but don’t put too much emphasis on it. On player stats: In the recruiting game a coach looks at many things in a young player but statistics aren’t at the top of his list and statistics may not even be on his list at all!! We parents tend to get caught up in the “good” statistics and can lose our objectivity when it comes to our sons. I quit getting wrapped up in statistics when I realized college and the conference kept “bad” statistics too! I suggested the bad statistics be printed in rose colored ink so they wouldn’t show up while I read them with my rose colored glasses. Big Grin
Fungo
Now I'm torn. TR, Fungo, and Bee made great points, and we all understand that numbers are just numbers. But, baseball itself is a game of numbers. Besides the score, you have 3 outs, 3 strikes, 4 balls, ERA, OBP, K/W and on and on. If the topic would have been posted by a member that was not in the midst of understanding the recruiting process this discussion may go in a different direction. I tip my hat to dad4boys for being involved, but, bottom line I think he is more of a "numbers crunching baseball freak" Wink than an overbearing 'high maintenance' parent.

It's 40 degrees in WI today after 85 yesterday so I'm a little on edge knowing that homeplate will have to be shoveled, not swept, I will be wearing a hat without a brim, and a glove on both hands in a few weeks. Mad
Last edited by rz1
Let me clarify my position.
1. I have never spoken to any one of my 4 kids coaches about anything related to how he runs the team. (Unless he has asked, I have coached rec and travel for a very long time)
2. I am a very good fund raiser so the coach calls on me very often.
3. My profession for 15+ years was building databases for large corporations. You can get more than you think from these numbers.
4. I will keep putting up numbers until you guys tell me to quit.
5. My 3 younger boys are right handed so I might even get around to the righties one day.
6. This project started with 20 schools and started growing out of control. Now I can't quit.
Last edited by dad4boys
Uh...not really. Can you tell me how many margaritas are within a three minute hobble from my house? That would be pretty useful to me right now. Home recovering from knee surgery...as if no one could tell I have time on my hands today by looking at the inordinate number of posts I've had.....crunch those numbers; compare the percieved bored poster to the truly informative poster - maybe on a regional and then nationwide basis.....

I'll PM you with my zip code and get back to me as quickly as possible on the margarita issue, please.
Surely all these baseball "experts" know that baseball is a thinking game and is often fascinating to people who love numbers. I'm impressed with Dad04boys and his ability to apply his intelligence to the game of baseball. You always have deviations, but you generally just can't argue with statistics! Most successful businesses invest a lot of money researching just such numbers to help their bottom line. Why should baseball be different?
Conclusions:
1 There is obviously a washout factor from freshman to sophmore year, either academicly, athleticly, emotionaly, financialy or both. Smile

2 More JUCO players transfer after two years than one.

The stats are likely similar for most non-rev sports.

I know the turnover in the general student population after freshman year is high. Lots of 1st year students just don't cut it for whatever reason.
Last edited by Dad04
dad4boys just a word of caution on the rosters. Depending on when you pull the info. Some schools have pulled their 2005 grads or draft picks off the rosters but not added the Freshman. At the same time some still have the class they are in from last year posted (upcoming season player will be a Senior but is still listed as a Junior). Not trying to be negative...it's just what I observed when looking at rosters during our search.

I guess I would say if a roster causes any concerns before scratching a school of your list talk to the coach about the roster. TRY TO ENJOY the process (don't know if thats possible!) and look past the numbers at times.
NC Dad thanks for the information. Not tying to be smug but my son is very strong academically and is too short for the pros (he will top out at 5'10"-5'11") so he will be focusing more on his education. If he finds a place to play he will be very happy. I look at the numbers because a very wise man once said ..if you cannot explain the process with numbers you do not understand the process.
Last edited by dad4boys
Bee,

The big time baseball schools have LHPs. The ones without lhps are the smaller schools DIII primarily and the schools in rural areas. (That is just from a quick lookover the schools.) I was suprised to see some larger schools with just a few lhps. The university of florida was the one with 6 fr, 2so, 2jr, and 2 sr. If I remember correctly.
Last edited by dad4boys
I would have thought that there would be a lot more lefties in the ratio's. My son, a 07 righty, has played a lot of travel ball and I swear that it seems like he has faced at least as many lefties as right handed pitchers. I would say the same holds true for his HS experiences as well. 2 of our top 3 pitchers were lefties last year.

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×