Skip to main content

13/14 year old youth league. Runner coming into second base stays on his feet to get in the way of a possible throw to first for a double play. OK, I know that in HS and above that ball is going to be thrown and the runner had better get out of the way or he's getting a face full of leather. What do you guys think, are these kids old enough to be taught to 'fire a warning shot' to entice the runners to slide? I don't like the thought of a kid getting hit in the face with a thrown ball, but I also don't like my second baseman being taken advantage of.
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

From the time I was able to turn a double play, which was at the age of twelve, I've always been taught to throw through the runner if he's between me and first base, it's his fault if he doesn't get out of the way, just as it's my fault if I do not avoid his hard slide. I haven't hit anybody in the face yet, and I'm going on 21 years with that philosophy.

Wink
Last edited by Glove Man
If the mif has to alter his throw in anyway because the runner does not slide then the runner and hitter are out. That is the way it is called in NC HS baseball. The mif should not worry about what the baserunner is doing. He should make the throw to first base and if the runner is not down yet he should throw through the runner. I have coached a long time and I have never seen a runner get hit yet. They will get down or get out of the way. If they do indeed hit a runner they need to understand that it is not their fault. I never told my guys to hit the baserunner. I have always just told them to make the throw and the runner will make the adjustment not you.
If an offensive player is old enough to learn how to break up a double play and the defensive player is old enough to turn it then the playing of the game should take it from there.

The offensive coach is not doing right by his players if he did not teach them to slide to break up a DP. He is doing far worse than that if he told them to stand up.
Coach May,
The rule is the same here in Iowa. Last year we had a play just like this. The runner did not slide or get out of the way. All he did was tuck in his arms and tip his head over. Our SS altered his throw not to hit him. The runner at the batter should both of been out. The ump did not call the batter out. Needless to say there was a discussion. We were told that the runner was not intentionaly trying to get in the way so it wasn't interference. Needless to say this discussion went on for ahwile and the called wasn't changed. This same ump told us in a rundown, the basepath can change. This is varsity baseball and these are certified umps. Not all umps in Iowa are this bad but we seem to always get them.
Last edited by Ametsman
the basepath thing can get a little cloudy. it's my understanding the basepath is a straight line from the br to the base he is going to, at the time of the defense trying to get him out. sparks many a spirited discusion around the water cooler. many local umps don't recognize this. which can cause many more spirited discusions. it's a great game.
20dad,
The questionable part of this is this runner was not in a rundown anymore. We had a runner between 3B and home in a rundown. The runner at 2B had started on his way to 3B. The runner between home and 3B went back to 3B so we made a play on the other runner. As we tagged him out the 3B runner took off for home. This is when he went out of the basepath to avoid the tag. This is when we got the explanation that in a rundown the basepath changes. This runner was no longer in a rundown. We should of had 2 outs. Instead we end up getting one out plus they get a run. We should of been out of the inning.

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×