Eyeontheball,
That slider clip was filmed with a black&white Fastec "SportsCam"...but shortly after working with the Fastec camera I went over almost exclusively to using a consumer camera--Casio EX-F1--which cost about $900 when I bought it in 2008.
Nowadays all my slo-mo videos are still recorded with the Casio EX-F1 operating at 300 fps. The resolution at 300 fps is 512 x 384 pixels, which is about 25% lower resolution than "standard" video (they make this slight resolution trade-off because high frame rates and high resolution both tend to eat up storage and memory). Playback is at 30 fps, so the slo-mo you get from video recorded at 300 fps is 10x slower than "real time". Here's a clip of Brad Ziegler I recorded at Oakland Coliseum using the EX-F1:
http://www.youtube.com/user/la...search/0/Lo3aKYtwR7oUnfortunately, Casio no longer makes the EX-F1, although Casio does offer some newer, cheaper models that will record at 240 fps at somewhat lower resotion than the EX-F1.
JVC also has a new hybrid on the market that will record 300 fps video with slightly better resolution than the Casio EX-F1. The cost of the JVC camera is around $700 - $800... can't remember the entire name of the model right now but it's:
JVC-"something"-PC10
If you're really interested I could chase down some more information for you. Just let me know.
Besides Casio and JVC I think there are now several other companies offering camcorders that will provide a basic level of slo-mo video capability in addition to the usual camcorder specs--in the price range of a couple hundred dollars.