Skip to main content

DMN reports

The Southlake Carroll baseball team had to forfeit a victory over Keller Central in its district opener on March 11 for using an ineligible player, coach Larry Hughes said. Carroll, which was No. 4 in SportsDay's latest 5A area rankings, will also have to forfeit every nondistrict win the player participated in.

"I haven't had time to go through and see how many it was,'' Hughes said. "I don't know if it was all, but it was at least the majority of them.''

Carroll is now 5-3 in District 5-5A and is tied with Keller Central for second place, one game behind Keller. Carroll went 11-3 in nondistrict play, and it is the only team to beat Plano West, the No. 1-ranked 5A team in the area.
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

It's too bad for SLC. In a nutshell, from what I understand, the rule states that if a player transfers into a district and lives with his parents, the player is eligible immediately. If the player transfers into a district and lives with anyone other than their parents (including a legal guardian), the player does not become eligible for one year. This was the case at SLC.
ALL transfers must be approved by each district's DEC. In MOST cases, when a student moves (transfers) and lives with their parents they are eligible. If the DEC finds that they moved for "athletic purposes" then the DEC can rule them ineligible.

We had a kid last year that moved from Mexico and lived with his uncle. This kid would have been an impact player for us as a catcher and a hitter. We tried to get a waiver for him while he played JV. The waiver never happened and when we informed the kid that he'd have to play JV, he moved back to Mexico. Coach has to be aware of the rules, it is his responsiblity whether that is fair or not. I know where all my baseball players live and make sure every year that they reside in our attendance zone. I won't speak for CISD, but in my district, if this were to happen to me, I'd be fired. I just hope they'd let me finish the season. Plus the UiL would most likely hand down some sort of sanction on me as well.

Coach Hughes is a great coach and knows his stuff. That is why this is so surprising to me. I bet there is more here than we know.
While I understand it's the coaches responsibility to know the rules and abide by them, I don't think there was any intent by Coach Hughes to circumnavigate them on purpose. From what I understand the kid in question is a good player but was in the lineup as the DH. There are plenty of kids available at SLC that could fill that spot.

Do others feel a coach should be dismissed for a violation of this type? In this case, I certainly don't.
I hope that I am not coming across as thinking that he should be fired. Everyone is capable of making a mistake.

What I am saying is that in my district that I coach in, if I were to play an ineligible player and had to forfeit games, I would be fired. Our AD has made that very, very clear to all coaches in this district.

Coach Hughes does a great job at SLC and is well respected in the HS coaching community.
doubleday,

Thanks, and I love the picture of Rodney Dangerfield (oh, but it looks good on you!?!?!) from Caddyshack!

There are lots of things that we as coaches have to consider and take care of behind the scenes. I know that some of the things that I do leave my parents scratching their heads. Sometimes, I let them know what I was thinking, sometimes I don't. Our AD does a great job of "educating" coaches in our district. I have learned alot from her in the past 2 years.

In my experiences I have seen coaches play ineligible players knowingly, and not knowingly. Every situation is different and unique. Luckily for Coach Hughes and those kids, they caught it before more district games were lost and they can still achieve most if not all the goals that their team set for this year.

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×