Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Good Morning O'Brady,

Where's the beef?-LOL Just Kidding

Any good players your way other than JH at Henry CO?

Heard of a couple. Glad I don't have to fight that Atlanta traffic anymore Smile

That perimeter all the way up to Roswell on I-285/I-85 is difficult to say the least. Guess it was worth it though with Jimmy Barthmaier, Jeremy Hermida, and Jeff Francouer and a few others a few years back.

Almost forgot about QuigleyLHP. How is he doing? Heard anything?

Shep
Last edited by Shepster
"Where's the beef?-LOL Just Kidding

Any good players your way other than JH at Henry CO?"

I just love their rolls, yummmm

I'm just getting into varsity ball in this area so other than a couple, like Brent Brewer, that's all I know.

Yesterday, game 1, I heard that the Pirates came to the school to see him hit and then several others were at the game to see what he can do. He did have a good game.
Last edited by obrady
One of my former coaches had us do this:

Pretend that you were going to have to throw someone out at the plate and you were in the OF. Now pretend to catch that ball and throw. We'd do that. Then, he'd say freeze after our crowhop. That length was our "maximum" stride length. Well take that for what it is worth but it is somewhat close to where you should be.
It also has to do with your style. If you're a Seaver-type, "drop & drive" pitcher (Oswalt being one), you're going to have a longer stride than those who emphasize the "stay tall, then fall" approach. My personal experience has been that the "tall/fall" approach is easier in that it emphasizes hip turn/trunk rotation as the source of power and velocity. Also, it's easier to stay of top of breaking pitches. Using a longer stride with the "tall/fall" approach will lock up the hips and prevent good trunk rotation.

I've never heard of a rule of thumb for stride length. Most pitchers experiment and stick with what works best for them.

The Prior/Maddux comparison is off base, as you're talking about two very different approaches to pitching. Maddux de-emphasizes velocity and hardly ever even uses a breaking pitch. He relies on movement, placement, and his change-up, plus he rarely goes over 100 pitches per outing. Prior is a classic power pitcher, using greater velocity and frequently using a hard breaking pitch. You can blame the power delivery's stress on the arm, or the curves and sliders if you want, but I doubt that stride length has anything to do with it.
IMO that the stride length is determined by the overall mechanics. You can start out with 90% of your height. As your mechanics become efficient, experiment with the length.

Landing on the heel first does not define a stride as being too long. Landing on the heel first can be an integral part of specific mechanics. A thrower may be using the heel first approach to set up hip opening into solid foot plant.

Landing flat footed is not an absolute to throwing at very high velocities at the pro level.
I don't teach heel-to-toe either but attempt to unteach it before it is internalized to the point of no return in the pitcher's natural habitat on mound.

As far as disregard heel-to-toe; don't think we have a choice in some cases to at least acknowledge it even though we may not agree with flaw of established pitcher.

Just my opinion now and not trying to stir the bee hive Smile

RHP I saw tonight didn't have that problem of heel to toe.

LOW, one of your guys did show up after we spoke Wink

Shep
I'm not trying to speak for cap'n, but from first-hand experience I know that he is not saying he teaches pitchers to land on their heel - because he taught my son to stop landing on his heel. But everything cap'n taught my son has been custom fit to this particular pitcher, not based on a cookie cutter or set of absolutes. So I'm not surprised to read that he might recommend leaving this aspect of the mechanics alone if it was working for that specific pitcher who was already successful at a high level of competition. Just my interpretation of that quote.
Last edited by MN-Mom
Maddogmt32-

quote:
I am a RHP and am about 6'3". I have a rather short stride and tend to throw across my body. Are there some drills that could work on both of the things and what could making my stride longer do for me?


Throwing across the body is not a function of stride length, it’s a function of where your stride foot lands. Landing to the throwing arm side of the body requires throwing across the body.

As a general rule, if the stride length is suited for your over all mechanics, lengthening the stride will make opening the hips into foot plant more difficult.


bbscout-

I disagree with your response in reference to my post…you make an assumption that landing on the heel equates to landing hard on the heel which leads to injury.

You wrote this statement which is inaccurate for the highest level of pro baseball’s high velocity pitchers. Landing on the heel first does not define bad, undesirable or harmful mechanics, or, the stride being too long. It does not mean the pitcher is landing hard, or, crashing into foot plant on the heel either.
As for stride length, there’s not a thing wrong with starting out with 90% of your height.

As the pitchers mechanics evolve, experiment by changing the length to see how the overall mechanics are affected.

You must learn to be a thrower before you learn to be a pitcher. High velocity throwers have value to me.
Last edited by bbscout
bbscout-

"skewer things"......hahahaha, you're too funny, and back to your old bait-n-switch tactics.

Landing on the heel is landing on the heel no matter how much you try to mask your satement.

I responded by saying this is not an absolute as you espouse, and by posting a 97mph clip that proves otherwise. Then you bring up N.y.m.a.n as a diversion....ROFLMAOhaha
Last edited by bbscout
Maddogmn32-

I replied to your concern about throwing across your body, and answered you with my understanding of what could happen if you lengthened your stride. In response to bbscouts statements about landing on the heel first, I hope I made it clear in previous posts that I wouldn’t teach landing on the heel first….but conversely, landing on the heel first is neither a bad thing nor is it an indicator that your stride is too long. The 97mph video clip I posted is proof of that.



bbscout-

I’m glad you feel safe at this web site and the fact that I can’t ban you, although, I haven’t a clue why you would want to, or feel the need to, post that here…it’s inappropriate. As well, bring up N.y.m.a.n. is totally inappropriate and has nothing to do with this posters questions…..you are back to your old tactics. If you want to debate, then let’s stay on track and debate item for item.

My clip did not require a “rebuttal” clip from you. I’m well aware of the advantages of landing flat footed. I even stated that I wouldn’t teach that mechanic. My clip was posted to illustrate that even with a short stride and small flex, a relatively average sized pitcher can land on the heel first and throw with high velocity. Who’s to say he’ll last 10-20 years, it’s a **** shoot at that velocity day in and day out.

quote:
how you land has nothing to do with velocity
How you land plays a major role in velocity. There are many different ways to enter into and then land the foot to solid foot plant. The mechanics leading up to and into solid foot plant landing define the load and unload sequences of the body. The load and unload sequences used in those mechanics are defined by how well the pelvis can be controlled. So, “how you land has nothing to do with velocity” is IMO, a very inaccurate and misleading statement.

In the future, refrain from comparing me to anyone.
Last edited by cap_n
bbscout,

While I don't post much I have been a long time moderator on the Florida Forum and I would consider editing your responses to cap_n. Your attempt to discredit him by trying to associate him with N.Y.M.A.N is inappropierate, a low blow to say the least.

You have been a valuable contributor for a long time and I personally enjoy your insight into the scouting process but don't stoop to low blow tactics for the sake of argument. As the father of a college pitcher I would welcome a "healthy" debate by you with cap_n.
Last edited by FLADAD
quote:
Originally posted by FLADAD:
bbscout,

While I don't post much I have been a long time moderator on the Florida Forum and I would consider editing your responses to cap_n. Your attempt to discredit him by trying to associate him with N.Y.M.A.N is inappropierate, a low blow to say the least.

You have been a valuable contributor for a long time and I personally enjoy your insight into the scouting process but don't stoop to low blow tactics for the sake of argument. As the father of a college pitcher I would welcome a "healthy" debate by you with cap_n. experiencewith points of merit.


My goodness..we are getting thin skinned around here. This wouldn't even merit a blink over in the hitting forum Smile I'm enjoying the spirited debate. It's kind of like the difference between style and technique. We should all learn to disregard style and look at the technique. (of debate in this case).
Last edited by troy99
What the heck? Eek

bbscout,

I have always appreciated and respected your input, but I cannot figure out why you started getting personal against Cap'n with the ny-man reference in this thread. I have not met very many of the members of this site personally yet, but I have known Cap'n for several years, have been to his home, met his family, and can tell you he is the kindest, nicest, most generous man I have met through any baseball activities in my life. I sincerely don't know why you would want to become his opponent.

Julie
bbscout/cap_n,

You guys need to kiss and make up! inlove

You're both very well respected (as well you should be) by most everyone here. good

Seems like this has turned into debate about landing on the heel.

IMO The clip "cap_n" posted is not a drastic example (IMO) of “jamming” the heel first.

One of the very first things I notice in any pitcher is his landing. One note that is never missed is if he lands on his heel. Because of potential injury and possible control problems in the future.

Certain players have gotten by doing things differently than the “establishment” standards. Being a proud member of the “establishment” this sometimes bothers me. However, having a fairly open mind it must be realized… Some have become very successful doing things the “wrong” way.

My take is that no one would ever “teach” landing on the heel, but there are pitchers who land on their heel.

The question is should “ALL” of those who land on their heel be changed? Despite the pitcher having success landing on the heel, I think that adjustment should at least be attempted. If it don’t work… Go back to landing on the heel! Bottom line… It has to work!

Major disadvantage of landing on heel being… It’s a jarring action!… That can’t possibly be good for the arm and makes controlling the ball harder.

Then again, what the hell do I know? I’ll answer that!... Not nearly as much as I want to! crazy
That’s why I read all these posts by both bbscout and cap_n and others.

As Shep would say it… You guys are great! ms
Last edited by PGStaff
quote:
Originally posted by PGStaff:
bbscout/cap_n,

You guys need to kiss and make up! inlove

As Shep would say it… You guys are great! ms


I'm not trying to stir the pot but .. I've been checking in here for 7 years but I must have missed a day! What did Nyma* do that has comparing someone to him the equal to being called a horse thief? noidea

Not to ostrasize (sp?) myself but I find the guy (Nyma*) interesting. Some others I find interesting... BBS, PG , SB, Linear (et al), Coachb25, and I'm adding Cap'n. (not a complete list of course). If I wanted to hear only what I agreed with I'd only listen to my wife. Big Grin

Please keep it coming...a few hurt feelings now and then are worth it (especially when they are someone else's Smile)

Seriously though, someone PM me with the low-down on N****.
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×