Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

I have found recently, especially in working with some younger (12-14 YO) hitters that no stride seems to make some things easier to teach. After a short period (6-8 weeks, sometimes longer, sometimes never), I usually end up giving it back to them.

As someone who hit no stride most of my (not legendary) career, I found it worked well for me. Of course, my job was just to slap the ball in play and run like "heck". However, I did find I was able to make contact with off-speed and breaking pitches much easier.

I would not recommend it for everyone though. Some kids reject it flatly--others just look massively uncomfortable. However, for many it seems to calm alot of things down. I find that when we go no stride, we usually end up giving just a portion of the original stride back.
IMO the key to hitting off-speed is having the ability to stay back and loaded, i.e. hands and weight. Additionally it helps to recognize spin.

Stride versus not stride ..... depends on the type of hitter. A hitter that doesn't stride needs to have the ability to know how to involve his lower half in his swing. Sometimes this can be difficult for a young hitter, or a hitter who isn't quite physical strong enough through his core and lower half. A stride can help a hitter that isn't quite there physically get his lower half involved. The key with the stride though is to get your foot down in time. A hitter can't fire his hands until he gets hits foot down. So keep the stride short.

There are lots of ways to hit.
Last edited by Tuzigoot

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×