I'm confident we're not alone in this scenario, but it's the first time it's ever hit us, so I'm seeking input, advice, or maybe just venting and welcoming feedback.
My 17 yr old has played with various select programs for many years (some top tier, some not), and is currently w/ what I'd consider perhaps a borderline top-tier organization (will be in BBI Premier Division). We began w/ them last Fall.
He's by no means a "phenom," but certainly a capable, versatile, well-rounded player. He starts on his varsity team. He's proven he can compete at whatever levels he's ever been placed.
I became concerned recently as I noticed our roster size grow to 20. Although we didn't try out as such, nor has it ever actually been stated, I'm getting the impression that the coaching staff has "labeled" my son as a PO (Pitcher-Only), and seldom used back-up, back-up, back-up catcher. He's never been that, as a matter of fact, has pitched only the last couple of seasons, although has been very effective.
Our main objective with H.S. summer ball is to get AB's. We also value getting some IP's in, but it's really not a priority. He can play any position on the field, and be at minimum adequate (in attempt to remain objective/unbiased), and perhaps even very good.
At risk of sounding critical of other kids, I see some players "locked-in" to every day/every inning positions, although their performances are frequently less than worthy of that.
We've never been complainers, but then again, never been in the position where it was an issue. He's always been a full-time player with every team he's played. Last thing I want is to be one of those "difficult" parents, or to do/say anything that could affect his PT or perception negatively. I would think, given our investment, we could at minimum count on a fair chance to compete for regular PT, but I'm not seeing it right now.
Although we're fully paid up (you all know these high $$ costs), we will move towards travel dates where expenses will be large, especially with rising travel costs. The notion of investing even more $$ only to ride the pine other than the occasional pitching appearance is not appealing.
Sorry for the long posting, just know many members here may have valuable input. I realize this may come accross as whiney, or some may say "welcome to the world of select baseball," etc. Your thoughts are welcomed.
Original Post