I am kind of with you on this one cabbagedad. There is no excuse for his behavior or his parents as well.
That article didn't really help his situation.
The honor bestowed upon him holds the winner to a different set of standards, I feel his parents have done a poor job in guiding him (yes 20 year old Heisman trophy winners still need guidance), but probably not really understanding the fame it would bring with no opportunity for any fortune, that's too bad. Perhaps the NCAA needs to do a better job at educating recipients, their family and their coaches. Who and what they need to stay away from. I do understand the conflict this presents, the coach gets a nice raise and the player doesn't even get his trophy.
NCAA needs to seriously readdress the issues that they are being confronted with year after year on amateurism, it is a different time we live in. I have seen grown men chase down pro athletes to get an autograph, only to sell them on ebay a few days later, even without being certified and authenticated. I know that has to bother many.
Perhaps some type of monetary award would erase some of the temptations that obviously could hurt the player's amateur status as well as the team's season.
Whatever it be, this incident means that your son, if he goes to an NCAA program may never be able to sign an autograph for anyone unless it is with the entire team.
Perhaps the people who vote will think twice about awarding it to someone so young.
As to the question asked, no, I don't really want him to see him play. The whole thing would be a distraction to the other players and that isn't really fair and it could jeopardize their future as well.