Kevin Kelly is a class act and a fantastic coach - no doubt about it. My personal criteria for rating a coach is:
1. Are they prepared or are they surprised by different situations?
2. Do they play hard?
3. Is the coach getting the best out of his players?
4. How does the coach interact with the players and are they responsive?
5. Is there respect for the game showed by the coaches and the players?
While wins, losses, and titles certainly do matter, certain teams do not get the level of talent it takes to get there year in and year out. Hammond, for example is not a hot bed of talent - they usually get a good crop every so often, but not like some of the other schools. Some coaches get so much talent, it just seems like there biggest job is to just not to over coach. Coach Lerner's teams meet my criteria year in and year out. While he certainly lacks the longevity of Coach Kelly - I feel he has earned his way into the conversation. I certainly mean no disrespect to any of the other coaches mentioned by Larry or anyone else - they all do a fine job and for just about nothing!