Skip to main content

1. Teaching rundowns the other day I told my guys that after making the feed / throw to their teammate to peel off out of the way instead of continuing on in case the runner turns around and we have an interference call. One of the guys asked me what happens if there is interference. I said the runners gets the base he was heading towards. My assistant said he thought the runner got the next base he would be trying to get.

Example - Runner on third and ball hit to 3Bman. He gets runner in rundown and throws ball to catcher but runner turns around heading back towards third and hits 3Bman.

My way he would get third since that is where he was heading.

My asst. coach way he would get home since that is the next available base.

He based that when he was at a DI school playing that situation happened and the ump gave the runner heading back towards third home.

Which way is correct and would there be a difference because we are talking about NFHS rules versus what they use in college?

2. Pitcher comes set but bounces his arms and shoulders three times - would this be a balk? It's all one continuous movement and "looks natural".

I hope that one makes sense in what I am trying to describe. If not let me know and I will try to give more information to you.

Nothing can stop the man with the right mental attitude from achieving his goal; nothing on earth can help the man with the wrong mental attitude. Thomas Jefferson

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

1. First of all, it's obstruction, not interference.

FED Rules. The ball remains live (delayed dead if you must) until all playing action stops. The umpire then calls time and awards the obstructed runner (and other runners affected) the bases they would have achieved had there been no obstruction. The obstructed runner is awarded at least one base beyond the base he had legally achieved when the obstruction occurred. In your example, the runner on 3rd would be awarded home. If the obstructed runner advances beyond the base he would have been awarded under the penalty, the obstruction is ignored and the ball remains live. The obstructed runner is at risk of being put out if he advances beyond his "award" base.

In NCAA there are two types of obstruction. Type 1 is when a play is not being made on the obstructed runner. The ball remains live until play stops, and the umpire will award any bases that are justified (including none). Type 2 is when a play is being made on the obstructed runner. Ball remains live until play stops, ump makes the same base awards except the obstructed runner is awarded a minimum of one base beyond the base he had legally acquired when the obstruction occurred. In both types, if the obstructed runner advances beyond his "award" base, he does so at the risk of being put out.

OBR is similar to NCAA except the types are reversed. Type A (play being made on the obstructed runner) ball is immediately dead and the ump awards bases to nullify the act of obstruction. The obstructed runner gets the same one base minimum as NCAA Type 2. Type B (no play being made on the obstructed runner), ball remains live until all play stops, ump then calls time and awards bases to nullify the act (including no base award). As in NCAA, same risk of being put out if the obstructed runner advances beyond his "award" base.

2. Had to be there. If he's not stopping, then I don't think it's a balk. Once he stops, he must deliver a pitch, throw or feint to a base or step off - one more "bounce" and he's balked. Is this guy related to Luis Tiant?
Thanks guys.

So basically in my first example (I couldn't remember if it was obstruction or interference) I would be wrong and my coach is correct?

Not sure where I got they are protected just going back to the base they were going.

As for the balk - it is a had to be there because I doubt I could explain it enough to give you guys enough information. I told him to not do it because it does open the door for an umpire to call a balk. Please don't take this as a criticism of umpires but something in the grey area such as this I don't want to give a bad umpire the rope to hang my team.

In all honesty I think a good ump would not balk it but you don't know for certain at the high school level what kind of ump you get good or bad.

I told him to come set and leave it be.
In your obstruction question Dash has it right, award the next base.
On your balk question, it sounds like he is making three stops but in a continuous motion and is probably OK but I like your thought of not giving an ump something to pick on. I see nothing wrong with pushing the envelope but when it gets to an spot of grey that is sometimes balked and sometimes not then he needs to stop doing it. This way you don't get in a big game and get banged at a bad time. Sounds like good coaching to me.
quote:
Originally posted by TW344:
Louis Tiant? Old time Red Sox pitcher. Sounds like that is what is going on. He got away with it for years. But if you don't need to push the envelope, don't push it. Good advice.

TW344

He was around long before MLB started cracking down on that stuff and was unofficially "grandfathered" from the interpretation. No one else could get away with "El Tiante's" stretch.

What a great competitor. Played for a bunch of teams but his best years were with the Sox.

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×