Skip to main content

High school game today, RF catches the ball but stumbles over the hill in deep right. He hangs on to the ball, but for the purpose of this question, lets say he drops it. Runner seeing no signal whatsoever from either umpire goes into the dugout and at that moment an out is finally ruled.

So in this situation, is am umpire REQUIRED to signal no catch?
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

quote:
Originally posted by NW Knights07:
High school game today, RF catches the ball but stumbles over the hill in deep right. He hangs on to the ball, but for the purpose of this question, lets say he drops it. Runner seeing no signal whatsoever from either umpire goes into the dugout and at that moment an out is finally ruled.

So in this situation, is am umpire REQUIRED to signal no catch?


Required by rule? Who knows. But any time the catch/no catch is not patently obvious, we will signal and call it. But we don't do that until the catch is complete, or the ball hits the ground.

You need to clarify your hypothetical situation. You have a fielder dropping the ball, the runner going into the dugout, and then the umpire ruling a catch. Houston, we have a problem.
quote:
Originally posted by NW Knights07:
High school game today, RF catches the ball but stumbles over the hill in deep right. He hangs on to the ball, but for the purpose of this question, lets say he drops it. Runner seeing no signal whatsoever from either umpire goes into the dugout and at that moment an out is finally ruled.

So in this situation, is am umpire REQUIRED to signal no catch?


No. Umpires are never required to signal no catch, just as players are never required to swing at an 0-2 pitch down the middle. But, in both cases, it's a good idea.
quote:
Originally posted by dash_riprock:
You need to clarify your hypothetical situation. You have a fielder dropping the ball, the runner going into the dugout, and then the umpire ruling a catch.


Sorry for not being completely clear on this, the umpire ruled the baserunner out for abondonment. Neither umpire signaled a catch, merely that the runner was out because he entered the dugout.

I know this COULD have been avoided, but SHOULD it have been avoided with a no catch signal. As I interperate this, the umpires no call whatsoever aided the defense, and put the offense down a baserunner.
quote:
Originally posted by NW Knights07:
quote:
Originally posted by dash_riprock:
You need to clarify your hypothetical situation. You have a fielder dropping the ball, the runner going into the dugout, and then the umpire ruling a catch.


Sorry for not being completely clear on this, the umpire ruled the baserunner out for abondonment. Neither umpire signaled a catch, merely that the runner was out because he entered the dugout.

I know this COULD have been avoided, but SHOULD it have been avoided with a no catch signal. As I interperate this, the umpires no call whatsoever aided the defense, and put the offense down a baserunner.


"I know this COULD have been avoided, but SHOULD it have been avoided with"...the BASE COACH telling him what to do. Don't dump this on the umpires... should a call/signal be make on a iffy catch/no-catch yes... but if you don't see either and you are in doubt... just ask...

Add Reply

Post
.
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×