Skip to main content

Curious on a ruling in the Braves/Nats game last week.

When Desmond hit the ball into the corner and it got "lodged" under the fence, Upton raised his hands signalling the ball was stuck....the umpire did not stop play and Desmond rounded the bases.  Upon seeing this, Upton reached down, picked up the ball and threw it in.

I always heard (and instructed the kids I coached) that if a ball goes out of play or becomes unplayable, raise your hands and DON"T TOUCH THE BALL until the ump inspects it.  I was always told (even by umpires in pre-game meetings) that if a player signals the ball is unplayable and then reaches down and disturbs the ball...it destroys the players claim the ball is unplayable and play continues.

My question is....is this actually a rule?  If so, why wasn't the play allowed to stand once Upton reached down and "disturbed" the ball when he picked it up and threw it?

Thanks

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Because it's not the rule.

 

You're told this because in HS games, you can't tell from the infield whether the ball is really under the fence (or lodged in the fence).  Raising the arms tells the umpire to come out and look AND makes it clear that the fielder didn't reach down and push the ball under the fence (to "create" a book-rule double as opposed to a triple, etc,.)

 

If the ball is seen as out of play, then it's out of play, not matter what a fielder might do to it after that.  OTOH, if the fielder reaches for and plays the ball before it's seen as out of play, then the umpire will assume that it was always in play.

Last edited by noumpere

Add Reply

Post
.
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×