quote:
Originally posted by Lost Dad:
So this lefty thing - I get it that there aren't as many lefties, etc. And I get some of the technical benefits of lefties - especially in pitching.
Hi Lost Dad,
Good lefties are indeed sought after as only 10% of the general population is left handed. So the pool for finding "good" lefties is much smaller. If you have and lefty and a righty that are equal in skill, size, velocity, and all other aspects, the lefty will be more sought after. . . because there are fewer of them.
At your son's age, having a pitching velocity in the mid 60's is an excellent place to be.
Paying for pitching lessons at this age is a very personal decision. IMHO, I feel it's way too early for that. . .and not really because boys of that age can't benefit from the lessons. It's just that so many things can change over the next few years. I didn't do it for my son, though many parents (who were providing their sons with pitching lessons) and even some coaches of my son's travel teams suggested it as my son at that age also pitched in the mid to high 60's (a RHP). And looking back, I feel I made the right choice for that reason (it was too soon). As time moved on, most of those parents who had their sons involved with pitching lessons at that age didn't find that that there was any advantage over those parents who started pitching lessons at a later age (like 16 or above).
I might add, at the younger ages the "good" pitchers tend to also be the more athletic and better players than others and that's why they're often a two-way player. And as time goes by, kids often change their perspective on things and make decisions about what they like and what they want to do that's different from when they were 12 or 13. I've very often observed that though a kid may really love baseball at this age and playing a particular position, many will not progress and may even become discouraged as their body doesn't mature in a way that's hoped for as other kids who were not very good early on advance quicker and father . . .which results in a kid deciding on some other sport or position.
I've seen many parents who spent a lot of money on pitching lessons find that their son reached a certain plateau and wasn't able to go beyond that and some would then chose some other avenue for their pleasure. Was it a waste of money for them? It depends on one's perspective. Even if a kid doesn't find much of a future in pitching, but still has fond memories of the instruction, then I guess won can say it's worth it in that case too.
As has mentioned, and in my opinion the most important thing is, if the child is really enjoying it and you can afford it. . .why not. But it'd be prudent not to place too much emphasis on the future since you just don't know where the ball is going to land.
The Jr. High years is a good time to let a boy have a really good time exploring his athletic talents (participate in other school sports along with the baseball). And I feel it's best to always raise the bar to see how he responds to higher levels of play. . . that's where money is better spent. IMHO