quote:
Originally posted by fillsfan:
CPLZ, IMO what the school did, as far as additional suspension for a technical foul, is absolutely ridiculous. A technical foul is a somewhat normal part of a game. I obvoiusly don't know the school but sounds like it is trying to protect it's image as much as anything else. Can you imagine a college team doing this!!
fillsfan,
Everyone I knows thinks the same thing, the school was just spinning its image.
Some great responses here.
I think there needs to be a distinction between teaching morals and teaching discipline. Morals are the parents job, and in that regard, I don't like interference from teachers. The reason is, that it's like ethics, it's a sliding scale that people usually use to fit how they would like the circumstance to work out. There is no fixed threshold, therefore, hands off for everyone except the parents.
Discipline, is all parties, parents/coaches/teachers. Just like my example, where I think my kid was treated overly harsh with his suspension, the net net, is that if he didn't do it, then he wouldn't have to worry about the suspension. The only recourse they have as players is to walk away...which unfortunately, 4 of the 5 sophomore team starters are probably going to do next year.
I'll give another example...when junior was in 6th grade he became academically inelgible for basketball because he got an F on the first test of the new semester, so was failing a class, automatically ineligible. There is a written policy on how this is handled and it went by the book. Junior was actually not allowed to play in games for two weeks, until the next math test brought him up to eligible status...good lesson for the squirt.
However...after the two weeks, not only would the coach not give him his starting position back, he wouldn't play him for another week. That I had a problem with. The reason I had a problem, is that all players should be treated the same and his arbitrary additional penalty usurped that. I was told by the Asst. Principle, that the coach had my sons best interest in mind...another thing that bugs the C rap out of me. In our district, anytime a policy or decision is questioned, the pat answer from teachers and administrators is, "it's for the kids and in their best interest", rather than an explanation. They expect at that point, that we should genuflect at the alter their wisdom, bow our heads and submissively be on our way.
Reeling it back in now...
, I think much of it comes from leadership at the schools. Like Coach2709 was referencing about the best asst. principle ever, he was a leader. Unfortunately, in our current district, we are totally rudderless, from the school board to and especially the Superintendant and Principle (HS). Here, communication flows from on up high and only rolls downhill.