Skip to main content

Hopefully this isn't too broad of a question. I just read that Jonathan Papelbon signed a one-year contract with the Red Sox for $6.25 million. He said contract talks "never really transpired into anything that made both sides happy."

I know players want a long term deal and the maximum amount of money they can obtain. But what else is there? Are there Van Halen-type clauses where they demand the brown M&Ms be removed from the clubhouse candy dish?

The main reason I ask is, I've long told my son, when you get to that point and they offer you $6.25 million. Don't be an idiot and hold out for $6.3!

I guess it seems to me that when you're talking salaries in excess of $1 million, when is enough enough and you can just stop the negotiations so that you can stay with your favorite team?
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Unfortunately contracts are how players keep score. Papelbon is one of those players that wants to max-out his earnings as a player, even if that means a series of one year deals either through arbitration or agreements with the team. In his mind if he has his normal season he will be due a significant raise over what he made this year, which probably wasn't part of a multi-year deal with the Sox. some players like Youk and Pedroia aren't looking to max out their deals and enjoy the security that their deals offered. Paps wants to test free agency and isn't shy about taking his chances in arbitration. He has come out and said that it obviously isn't about the actual money itself but about where he stands among his peers contract wise. Unfortunately it is what it is...money in their contract is how some of the upper eschelon players keep score. Thankfully most of the Sox are not that way, at least the non-Boras guys (Paps is NOT a Boras guy I believe).
quote:
Originally posted by Doughnutman:
I've always admired guys who sign one year contracts. It takes a lot of faith in your ability to be the best and it always keeps them in a contract year. Takes a lot of guts IMO.


I understand what you're saying, but it sure doesn't seem to be very smart - especially as a pitcher where your value is totally dependant on the health of your arm.

MLB contracts are guaranteed, so it seems a whole lot smarter to work a competitive multi-year deal that's guaranteed. Those guts won't do you a lot of good if you blow out your elbow this year and nobody offers you a contract next year.

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×