Skip to main content

I’m pretty sure I know the answer to this question, but I thought I’d ask in case I misinterpreted something. State association has implemented the 10 run speed-up rule. Bottom of 6th, 2 outs. HT winning 12-3. Runners on 2nd and 3rd. Single up the middle and both runners come across ending the game.

 

I have the final score 13-3 because of NFHS 4.2.2… By state association adoption, the game shall end when the visiting team is behind 10 or more runs after 4 ½ innings, or after the 5th inning , if either team is 10 runs behind and both teams have had an equal number of times at bats.

 

IOW. The way I read it, as soon as the 13th run touched the plate, the game was over.

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

I would think that the "or more runs" is in there in the case that if the home team is down by more than 10 runs, they get their last at bat in the bottom of the inning.  The game will end if they are still down by 10 or more runs.  If they didn't add the "or more runs", you could argue that the statement only applies if the team is down by exactly 10 runs.  Can't have that!!  

Last edited by bballman
Originally Posted by 2017LHPscrewball:

Not an ump but going to play devil's advocate for a second.  If the rule is in fact worded "10 or more runs" would that not imply that the score differential can in fact be greater than 10?  If 10 were the limit, shouldn't they word it "upon reaching a 10 run differential the game shall end" or something like that?

IMO, it only implies it for the home team.  Visitors could score & be up by more than 10 in that last inning.  Home team still gets to bat in the bottom of the inning.

Originally Posted by bballman:

I would think that the "or more runs" is in there in the case that if the home town is down by more than 10 runs, they get their last at bat in the bottom of the inning.  The game will end if they are still down by 10 or more runs.  If they didn't add the "or more runs", you could argue that the statement only applies if the team is down by exactly 10 runs.  Can't have that!!  

Beat me to it...

Again, looking at the exact wording, the "after the 5th inning" reference has only the 10 run differential - not 10 or more.  But more importantly, can you explain the HR exemption and possibly the reference to having batter touch 1B if there were 2 outs?  How are either of these relavent when play apparently stops immediatley upon the 10th run getting plated?  Is there some implication that play needs to reach a natural, or unnatural, stopping point?  What about a ground rule double?

 

All in good fun!

 

This thread reminds me of a situation where it didn't really matter if my son was on deck or not.

 

Son's HS team is the home team, up by 9 runs in the 5th inning, two outs, bases loaded and son is on deck.  No matter what the batter at the plate does (hit, out or walk), the game is either,  over (10 run rule) or they are headed out to the field for the 6th inning.

 

 

Originally Posted by 2017LHPscrewball:

Again, looking at the exact wording, the "after the 5th inning" reference has only the 10 run differential - not 10 or more.  But more importantly, can you explain the HR exemption and possibly the reference to having batter touch 1B if there were 2 outs?  How are either of these relavent when play apparently stops immediatley upon the 10th run getting plated?  Is there some implication that play needs to reach a natural, or unnatural, stopping point?  What about a ground rule double?

 

All in good fun!

 

On the touching first base, if the runner doesn't make it safely to first, the run can't be scored.

Add Reply

Post
.
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×